首页> 外文OA文献 >Paul and Barnabus in Lystra (Acts 14:8-20): the contextualization of the gospel in a Graeco-Roman city
【2h】

Paul and Barnabus in Lystra (Acts 14:8-20): the contextualization of the gospel in a Graeco-Roman city

机译:保罗和巴拿巴在吕斯特拉(使徒行传14:8-20):格雷厄科罗马城市福音的语境化

摘要

This thesis will investigate the extensive Graeeo-Roman characteristics of the Lystra speech and in so doing convey some clarity in the otherwise widely differing opinions held about it. This will be achieved by showing that Lystra was a Hellenistic city of some importance with a variedpopulation. It will be argued that the initial reaction of the Lystrians to the miraculous healing of the cripple isto be understood as representing typical Graeeo-Roman notions. This will include Luke's use of a legend which not only adds local colouring to the narrative but also introduces Graeeo-Roman themes such as the blurring of the distinction between humans and gods and the custom of sacrifice. This contextua1ization immediately portrays the Graeeo-Roman nature of the Lystrians' behaviour and attitudes. In addition to these themes it will be argued that the Lystrians are shown to being reliant on secondary notions of God, which when exposed to the proc1amation of the apostles will prove to be inadequate. It will also be argued that the speech of the apostles is structured in a typically Graeco-Roman rhetorical form, where the errors are first exposed before the truth is presented. In conjunction with this structure it will be argued that the philosophical concept of Θεοπρaεπέζ which Dibelius has shown to be clearly presupposed in the Areopagus speech, is not only present in the Lystra speech but forms the philosophical basis on which it is structured. This concept explains the insistence by the apostles that they are human and that God has no need of such worthless things as sacrifices. It also explains the presentation of God's activity in creation and providence as an antithesis to a god who is in need. The Graeco-Roman aspects are brought to a close with the discussion of idea that an awareness of God does not depend on secondary notions acquired from legends or customs but that the truth is grasped through a process of reflection on creation and providence. This is an important notion in the speech for it exposes the Lystrians as being in need of a reorientation of their beliefs in God, away from those which are secondary to those which are primary and compatible with the truth.
机译:本文将研究Lystra语音的广泛的Graeeo-Roman特征,从而在对此持不同意见的情况下传达一些清晰度。这将通过证明吕斯特拉是一个希腊化的城市,人口众多而实现。有人认为,Lystrians对cr子的奇迹般愈合的最初反应应理解为代表典型的Graeeo-Roman概念。这包括卢克(Luke)对传奇的使用,不仅为故事增添了局部色彩,而且还引入了Graeeo-Roman主题,例如人与神之间的区分模糊以及牺牲的习俗。这种语境化立即刻画了利斯特里亚人行为和态度的格雷欧罗马特征。除了这些主题之外,还将论证Lystrians被证明依赖于上帝的次要概念,而当暴露于使徒的使徒行传时,这将被证明是不够的。也将争辩说,使徒的讲话是以典型的古罗马-罗马修辞形式构成的,其中的错误首先在陈述真相之前暴露出来。结合这种结构,人们将争辩说,狄贝里乌斯已经证明在Areopagus语音中明确预设了Θεοπρaεπέζ的哲学概念,它不仅存在于Lystragus语音中,而且构成了其结构的哲学基础。这个概念解释了使徒们坚持认为他们是人类,并且上帝不需要诸如牺牲之类的毫无价值的事情。它还解释了上帝在创造和天意中的活动的表述,作为对有需要的上帝的对立。格雷-罗马的各个方面通过讨论以下思想而结束:对神的认识并不取决于从传说或习俗中获得的次要概念,而是通过对创造力和天意的反思过程来掌握真理。这是演讲中的一个重要概念,因为它使Lystrians暴露了他们需要重新定向对上帝的信仰,而不是那些次要的,次要的,与真理相符的信仰。

著录项

  • 作者

    Germiquet Edouard Ariste;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1992
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号