首页> 外文OA文献 >Cross-sectoral differences in the drivers of innovation: evidence from the Irish Community Innovation Survey
【2h】

Cross-sectoral differences in the drivers of innovation: evidence from the Irish Community Innovation Survey

机译:创新驱动力的跨部门差异:来自爱尔兰社区创新调查的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to analyse differences in the drivers of firm innovation performance across sectors. The literature often makes the assumption that firms in different sectors differ in their propensity to innovate but not in the drivers of innovation. The authors empirically assess whether this assumption is accurate through a series of econometric estimations and tests. Design/methodology/approach: The data used are derived from the Irish Community Innovation Survey 2004-2006. A series of multivariate probit models are estimated and the resulting coefficients are tested for parameter stability across sectors using likelihood ratio tests. Findings: The results indicate that there is a strong degree of heterogeneity in the drivers of innovation across sectors. The determinants of process, organisational, new to firm and new to market innovation varies across sectors suggesting that the pooling of sectors in an innovation production function may lead to biased inferences. Research limitations/implications: The implications of the results are that innovation policies targeted at stimulating innovation need to be tailored to particular industries. One size fits all policies would seem inappropriate given the large degree of heterogeneity observed across the drivers of innovation in different sectors. Originality/value: The value of this paper is that it provides an empirical test as to whether it is suitable to group sectoral data when estimating innovation production functions. Most papers simply include sectoral dummies, implying that only the propensity to innovate differs across sectors and that the slope of the coefficient estimates are in fact consistent across sectors.
机译:目的:本文的目的是分析跨部门的企业创新绩效驱动因素的差异。文献经常假设不同部门的企业创新倾向不同,但创新驱动力却没有差异。作者通过一系列计量经济学的估计和检验,从经验上评估了该假设是否正确。设计/方法/方法:所用数据来自2004-2006年爱尔兰社区创新调查。估计了一系列多元概率模型,并使用似然比检验对所得系数进行了跨扇区参数稳定性的检验。研究结果:结果表明,跨部门创新的驱动力存在高度异质性。过程,组织,公司新事物和市场新事物的决定因素因部门而异,这表明创新生产功能中部门的集合可能导致有偏见的推论。研究的局限性/意义:结果的含义是,旨在刺激创新的创新政策需要针对特定​​行业进行定制。考虑到跨不同部门创新驱动因素的高度异质性,一种适合所有政策的规模似乎不合适。独创性/价值:本文的价值在于,在评估创新生产功能时,是否适合对部门数据进行分组提供了经验检验。大多数论文只包含部门的虚拟变量,这意味着各个部门之间只有创新倾向不同,并且系数估计的斜率实际上在各个部门之间是一致的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Doran Justin; Jordan Declan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号