首页> 外文OA文献 >The roles of interaction and proximity for innovation by Irish high-technology businesses: policy implications
【2h】

The roles of interaction and proximity for innovation by Irish high-technology businesses: policy implications

机译:爱尔兰高科技企业的互动和接近对创新的作用:政策含义

摘要

This paper presents new survey-based evidence on the increasingly topical question of what drives innovation in Irish high-technology businesses. The extraordinary performance of the Irish economy since the 1990s has been inextricably linked to highly successful foreign-owned businesses, in sectors such as pharmaceuticals, electronics and computers (Gallagher, Doyle and O’Leary, 2002). It might be expected that innovation in these multi-nationals is largely sourced in other group companies located abroad. It is therefore pertinent to ask, in the context of the recent policy recommendations of the Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) (2004), the extent to which these Irish subsidiaries source innovation in Ireland. This may be through their own research and development efforts and/or through interaction for the purposes of promoting innovation with other locally or regionally based businesses, Third Level Colleges and innovation support agencies, such as IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland. Moreover, it may be equally important to ask, in the context of the long-standing emphasis on improved performance of indigenous industry, whether indigenous high-technology businesses interact locally or regionally in order to promote innovation. Beginning with Culliton (1992) and continuing to the present, through, for example, Forfás (2004a) and the ESG (2004), Irish industrial policy has consistently promoted and supported clusters and networks. In recent years substantial State funding has also been devoted to research and development. The National Development Plan 2000-2006 (2000) allocated €2.5 billion and the government established Science Foundation Ireland. The ESG (2004) has proposed further State investment in research and development as well as new initiatives including building enterprise capability, funding collaboration between industry and Irish Third Level Colleges, introducing tax credits for research and development. There is a consensus in the Irish, and indeed the European, policy community that developing innovation through clusters and networks will be important for future Irish and European competitiveness (Bergin et al., 2003; Forfás, 2003; National Competitiveness Council, 2003; European Commission, 2003). By presenting survey based evidence on the sources of innovation in Irish high-technology industry, this paper makes an important contribution to this debate. It begins by outlining the design of the survey instrument and then presents the results. The policy implications of the results are then discussed.
机译:本文提供了新的基于调查的证据,说明了有关推动爱尔兰高科技企业创新的话题越来越多的问题。自1990年代以来,爱尔兰经济的出色表现与制药,电子产品和计算机等领域的高度成功的外资企业密不可分(Gallagher,Doyle和O’Leary,2002年)。可以预期,这些跨国公司的创新主要来自位于国外的其他集团公司。因此,有必要根据企业战略集团(ESG)(2004)的最新政策建议,询问这些爱尔兰子公司在爱尔兰进行创新的程度。这可以通过他们自己的研发工作和/或通过互动来促进与其他本地或区域性企业,第三级学院和创新支持机构(例如爱尔兰IDA和爱尔兰企业)的创新。此外,在长期强调改善土著工业绩效的背景下,询问土著高科技企业是否在本地或区域互动以促进创新也可能同样重要。从卡利顿(Culliton,1992)一直延续到现在,例如,通过福特(Foras)(2004a)和ESG(2004),爱尔兰的工业政策一直在促进和支持集群和网络。近年来,大量的国家资金也投入了研发。 2000-2006年国家发展计划(2000)拨款25亿欧元,政府成立了爱尔兰科学基金会。 ESG(2004)提出了国家对研发的进一步投资以及包括建设企业能力,资助工业与爱尔兰第三级学院之间的合作,为研发引入税收抵免等新举措。爱尔兰乃至欧洲政策界都达成共识,即通过集群和网络发展创新对于未来爱尔兰和欧洲的竞争力至关重要(Bergin等,2003;Forfás,2003;国家竞争力委员会,2003;欧洲委员会,2003年)。通过提供基于调查的证据,以证明爱尔兰高科技产业的创新来源,本文为这一辩论做出了重要贡献。首先概述调查仪器的设计,然后介绍结果。然后讨论结果的政策含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jordan Declan; OLeary Eoin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号