首页> 外文OA文献 >The operation of the Employment Tribunal: An investigation of the personal grievance adjudication procedure under the Employment Contracts Act 1991
【2h】

The operation of the Employment Tribunal: An investigation of the personal grievance adjudication procedure under the Employment Contracts Act 1991

机译:就业法庭的运作:根据《 1991年就业合同法》调查个人申诉裁决程序

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The passage of the Employment Contracts Act by the National government in 1991 caused considerable controversy amongst trade unions in New Zealand and legal practitioners. I decided to examine whether the government had met its stated intentions to create a straight-forward, cheap, and accessible system for resolving personal grievances. Therefore the main questions to be asked related to what people’s experiences were using adjudication under the Act, and whether the system adequately resolved personal grievance issues. In particular, I focused on the experiences of participants using the personal grievance adjudication procedure. The question of whether the process actually worked for participants could be measured by examining available access to the system in terms of cost and accessibility of representation. Another factor to be considered related to whether ultimate conclusions reached by the employment tribunal adequately addressed the issues raised. For example – did grievance receive adequate compensation? What were the costs involved to the parties and did the grievant have suitable employment? This research investigated whether the personal grievance adjudication system work in the manner intended by the government of the day for those participants.Interviews with employment tribunal adjudicators were a crucial art of determining whether or not the adjudication process worked successfully. Adjudicators were very open and willing to participate, and a considerable amount of unexpected, useful information was forthcoming. Surveys of participants in 150 personal grievances which occurred in 1997 supported the information provided by adjudicators. Data obtained from researching all personal grievance and cost decisions in 1997 providedxvquantitative support to the comments made by adjudicators, and those received by survey participants.The wide range of research methodologies used in conducting this thesis gives some credence to the conclusions reached as the range of processes used covered many different aspects of the adjudication system and how it affected participants in an unprecedented manor. The research conducted by Ian McAndrew in Otago covered the entire period during which the Employment Contracts Act 1991 was enforced. However, the questions asked in this thesis have tended to be more specific.In summary, my research has suggested that whether or not the Employment Contracts Act 1991 adjudication system worked largely depended on circumstances of each individual participant. Members of the legal profession felt most at home using adjudication, whilst many applicants and some respondents felt varying degrees of trepidation. Likewise, the views of adjudicators regarding the success of the system often depended on their background and experience.
机译:1991年,国民政府通过了《就业合同法》,在新西兰工会和法律从业者中引起了相当大的争议。我决定检查政府是否达到了其声明的意图,即创建一个简单,便宜且可访问的系统来解决个人申诉。因此,要问的主要问题与人们根据该法案进行审判时的经历有关,以及该制度是否充分解决了个人申诉问题。我特别关注参与者使用个人申诉裁决程序的经验。可以通过检查代表费用和可访问性方面对系统的可用访问权来衡量该过程对参与者是否真正起作用的问题。需要考虑的另一个因素涉及就业法庭的最终结论是否充分解决了提出的问题。例如–申诉是否获得了足够的赔偿?双方所涉及的费用是多少,申诉人是否有合适的工作?这项研究调查了个人申诉裁决系统是否按照当日政府针对这些参与者的方式工作。与就业法庭裁决者的面谈是确定裁决程序是否成功的关键技术。评审员非常开放,乐于参与,并且即将出现大量意想不到的有用信息。 1997年对150个个人申诉中的参与者进行的调查支持了裁决人提供的信息。从1997年对所有个人申诉和成本决定的研究中获得的数据为审判员的意见和调查参与者的意见提供了定量的支持。进行本论文所用的广泛研究方法为得出的结论提供了一定的可信度。所使用的流程涵盖了裁决系统的许多不同方面,以及它如何影响到前所未有的庄园中的参与者。伊恩·麦克安德鲁(Ian McAndrew)在奥塔哥(Otago)进行的研究涵盖了1991年《雇佣合同法》(Extracts Contracts Act 1991)实施的整个时期。但是,本文提出的问题往往更为具体。总而言之,我的研究表明,《 1991年雇佣合同法》的裁决系统是否有效在很大程度上取决于每个参与者的情况。法律行业的成员在使用裁决时感觉最为在家,而许多申请人和一些受访者则感到不同程度的恐惧。同样,评审员对系统成功的看法通常取决于他们的背景和经验。

著录项

  • 作者

    Beck Linda;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号