首页> 外文OA文献 >Figuring Desire : psychoanalytic perspectives on the discourse surrounding Colin McCahon and Ralph Hotere
【2h】

Figuring Desire : psychoanalytic perspectives on the discourse surrounding Colin McCahon and Ralph Hotere

机译:塑造欲望:围绕科林·麦卡洪和拉尔夫·霍特尔的论述的心理分析观点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis presents an interweaving of the discourse surrounding Colin McCahon and Ralph Hotere, the philosophy of art, and Lacanian psychoanalysis. In so doing, a Lacanian understanding of subjectivity, painting, discourse, and their interrelationships is elaborated in order to generate some new perspectives on, specifically, the work of McCahon and Hotere, and related writing and testimony, and more generally, the practice of art history and art criticism in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In the first place, this project explains, develops, and applies a Lacanian model of subjectivity/meaning-making understood in terms of the figuring of desire. This formula models expressions of subjectivity/meaning-making in terms of the reciprocity obtaining between the agent-like, metaphoric precipitation and automatist, metonymic perpetuation of symptomatic formations or points de capiton in discourses of desire. Secondly, this study analyses the discourse comprising paintings by McCahon and Hotere, and related writing, from the perspective of two points de capiton – the key features of which are gathered under the rubrics ‘McCahon’s doubt’ and ‘Hotere’s reticence’. The thesis demonstrates that these two formations enliven the possibility of interpreting McCahon discourse and Hotere discourse, respectively, in terms of repeated and contradictory characterisations of McCahon as a visionary and a doubter, and of Hotere as eloquent and reticent. Furthermore, the thesis shows how, by virtue of their fixation on the symptomatic formations ‘McCahon’s doubt’ and ‘Hotere’s reticence’, respectively, McCahon and Hotere discourses bear witness to radically contingent affirmations of, or leaps of faith in, praxes of contradiction, thereby sustaining fantasies of the revelation of the reality and truth of the being and meaning of art subjects and art objects. The impossibility of objectively realising these fantasies testifies to the status of subjective desire as that which seeks only its own perpetuation or that finds fulfilment in endlessly missing its aim and, by the same token, in Lacanian terms, underscores the (structural and ethical) necessity of subjectively being in and as traversing fantasy.
机译:本文提出了围绕Colin McCahon和Ralph Hotere的论述,艺术哲学和Lacanian精神分析的交织。通过这样做,拉康对主观性,绘画,话语及其相互关系的理解得以阐述,以便对麦卡翁和荷特的作品以及相关的写作和证词,以及更广泛的说来,产生一些新的观点。新西兰Aotearoa的艺术史和艺术批评。首先,该项目解释,发展并应用了拉康式的主观性/意义创造模型,这些模型是根据对欲望的理解而理解的。该公式以主体,隐喻沉淀和欲望话语中症状形式或capiton点的自动化,转喻永存之间的互惠性为基础,对主观性/含义的表达进行建模。其次,本研究从两个角度进行了分析,分析了包括麦卡洪和荷特的绘画以及相关著作在内的话语-他们的主要特征集中在“麦卡洪的怀疑”和“霍特尔的沉默”两个标题下。论文表明,这两种形式分别以麦卡洪为有远见者和怀疑者,以及荷特为雄辩而沉默寡言的反复和矛盾的表征,分别阐释了麦卡洪话语和荷特尔话语的可能性。此外,论文还说明了麦卡洪和荷特尔的话语如何分别通过对“麦卡洪的怀疑”和“霍特尔的沉默”的症状形式的注视,证明了对矛盾的根源的激进的或然的肯定或信念的飞跃,从而维持了对艺术品主体和艺术品的存在和意义的真实与真相的揭示的幻想。客观地实现这些幻想是不可能的,这证明了主观欲望的状态,即仅寻求自身永存的事物或在不断地失去其目标的情况下实现满足的事物,并且以拉康的话说,这同样强调了(结构上和伦理上的)必要性主观地处于幻想之中并作为幻想穿越。

著录项

  • 作者

    Khan David Michael;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号