首页> 外文OA文献 >Innovations in management accounting research and practice: Whatever happened to Throughput Accounting?
【2h】

Innovations in management accounting research and practice: Whatever happened to Throughput Accounting?

机译:管理会计研究与实践的创新:吞吐量会计发生了什么?

摘要

Despite the identification of the potential to undertake scholarly research inThroughput Accounting (TA) (Noreen et al, 1995; Dugdale & Jones, 1998; Jones& Dugdale, 1998), to date there has been a paucity of published studies of TA.This paper argues that TA, and the production management system it supports –the Theory of Constraints (TOC) are fads/fashions in accordance withAbrahamson’s (1996) framework and posits that negative connotations regardingthe term fads/fashions along with the likening of management fads/fashions toaesthetic fads/fashions could be likely reasons for the lack of scholarly interestfrom accounting researchers. Furthermore, this paper extends the managementfads/fashions literature by extending the debate to include accounting academicsand research networks. It is argued that accounting researchers, accountingresearch agendas and accounting research networks can be deemed to befads/fashions as they exhibit many of the characteristics of managementfads/fashions including, lifecycles, rhetoric and gurus. Such a classificationhowever, does not rule out the potential for theoretically sound scholarly research,rather it widens the opportunities for researchers.This paper demonstrates empirically that TA is a topic worthy of inclusion inresearch agendas. TOC implementation causes several changes to managementcontrol systems and uses accounting information as the primary method ofproduction scheduling. In addition, operational staff in firms with TOC useaccounting information to plan and manage their work on a daily basis. Firmswith TOC change the way they measure and evaluate performance as well asinclude throughput information in their capital budgeting processes. It is arguedthat a firm which implements TOC will change its Management Control Systemparticularly in relation to overhead allocation and the dissemination of financialinformation to all levels of the firm. These changes are driven by an apparentparadigm shift in operational thinking by managers and staff of firms that haveimplemented TOC. Furthermore these changes are significant enough to warrantfurther investigation into TA and the processes relating to management controlsystem change. This paper concludes with some suggestions for future researchand poses some challenges to accounting scholars.
机译:尽管已经确定了可以在通量会计(TA)中进行学术研究的潜力(Noreen等,1995; Dugdale&Jones,1998; Jones&Dugdale,1998),但迄今为止,关于TA的已发表研究很少。 TA及其支持的生产管理系统-约束理论(TOC)是根据Abrahamson(1996)框架的流行/时尚,并假设与术语“流行/时尚”相关的负面含义以及管理流行/时尚与审美流行的比喻/时尚可能是会计研究人员缺乏学术兴趣的可能原因。此外,本文通过将辩论扩展到包括会计学者和研究网络,扩展了管理时尚/时尚文献。有人认为,会计研究人员,会计研究议程和会计研究网络可被视为时尚/时尚,因为它们表现出管理时尚/时尚的许多特征,包括生命周期,修辞和专家。但是,这样的分类并不能排除理论上合理的学术研究的潜力,反而为研究人员扩大了机会。本文实证表明TA是值得纳入研究议程的主题。 TOC的实施对管理控制系统进行了几处更改,并将会计信息用作生产计划的主要方法。此外,拥有TOC的公司的运营人员每天使用会计信息来计划和管理其工作。拥有TOC的公司改变了衡量和评估绩效的方式,并在其资本预算流程中包括了吞吐量信息。有人认为,实施TOC的公司将改变其管理控制系统,特别是在间接费用分配和向公司各个层面分发财务信息方面。这些变化是由实施TOC的公司的管理人员和员工在经营思想上的明显范式转变所驱动的。此外,这些变化非常重要,足以保证进一步调查技术援助和与管理控制系统变化有关的过程。本文最后提出了对未来研究的一些建议,并对会计学者提出了一些挑战。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jackman S.M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号