首页> 外文OA文献 >Laboratory comparison of odour control techniques for separated residential food waste
【2h】

Laboratory comparison of odour control techniques for separated residential food waste

机译:分离的住宅餐厨垃圾气味控制技术的实验室比较

摘要

With a moisture content of 75-85% and organic matter content over 80%, food residues can be amajor source of odour during storage. A series of laboratory tests were conducted to compare odourcontrol techniques for separated residential food waste under controlled conditions. A subjectiveodour intensity scale was used to monitor performance. The results indicate the importance ofmoisture absorption to control odours from food waste storage containers. Of the four additivesconsidered, newspaper seemed to be the most effective because of its high moisture absorptivecapacity and its ability to wrap the food wastes. Additives that would be expected to absorb orneutralise volatile, odour-causing compounds-- baking soda, EM Bokashi, and cat litter-- were notas effective, and neither was an additive that was expected to change the decomposition process andso change the odour production (EM Bokashi). Baking soda and EM Bokashi did not enhance waterabsorption when added to the waste. On the other hand, water absorption capability of cat littervaried depending on the placement method used and the form/size of the material.
机译:水分含量为75-85%,有机物含量超过80%,食物残渣在存储过程中可能是主要的气味来源。进行了一系列实验室测试,以比较在受控条件下分离的住宅食物垃圾的气味控制技术。主观气味强度量表用于监测表现。结果表明吸潮对于控制食物垃圾存储容器中的气味的重要性。在考虑的四种添加剂中,报纸似乎是最有效的,因为它具有很高的吸湿能力和包裹食物垃圾的能力。预期会吸收和消除挥发性气味化合物的添加剂-小苏打,EM Bokashi和猫砂-效果不佳,并且预期不会改变分解过程并因此改变气味产生的添加剂( EM Bokashi)。将小苏打和EM Bokashi添加到废物中后,吸水率不会提高。另一方面,猫砂的吸水能力取决于所用的放置方法和材料的形式/尺寸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号