首页> 外文OA文献 >Illinois Government Research no. 56 1983: Prison Capacity and Sentencing Severity: A Look at Illinois, Michigan, and Pennsylvania
【2h】

Illinois Government Research no. 56 1983: Prison Capacity and Sentencing Severity: A Look at Illinois, Michigan, and Pennsylvania

机译:伊利诺伊州政府研究号56 1983年:监狱容量和判刑严重程度:了解伊利诺伊州,密歇根州和宾夕法尼亚州

摘要

After a brief lull in the late seventies and early eighties, crimeis once again a prime concern among a large number ofAmericans. More people are mentioning crime in periodicsurveys of public problems than in the previous decade, andthe 1982 governor's race in California may have been won atthe eleventh hour by a strong law and order appeal. In theminds of many, criminal punishment is an integral part of thecrime problem and society's efforts to combat it. It is viewedas both a real and a symbolic deterrent to crime, every bitas important as a mobile, effective police force. This has ledto a reexamination of sentencing practices and a revision ofsentencing codes, an increase in minimum punishments, andeven new prison construction. Illinois, for example, movedfrom an interdeterminate to a determinate sentencing code,abolished its parole board, and enacted Class X legislationproviding more severe sentences for selected heinous crimes.More recently it has embarked upon a campaign to increaseits state penal capacity. Indeed, a recent report of the IllinoisEconomic and Fiscal Commission shows that the Departmentof Corrections received 75 percent of all new capital projectdollars for FY 1983 ??? in excess of $80 million.Many students of criminal courts have doubted the effectivenessof these reforms. They note the low visibility of mostsentencing decisions and the vested interest of most criminalcourt practitioners in the status quo. Of particular concernare the long-established "going rates" for routine offenseson which county plea bargaining practices are based. Tobetter understand the sentencing process ??? and improveour chances to reform it ??? we undertook a long-term comparativestudy of criminal courts. The focus of the presentessay is on factors that affect sentencing severity. Suchfactors are, of course, of special interest to those concernedwith increasing the deterrent effect of sentencing.
机译:在七十年代末和八十年代初短暂的平静之后,犯罪再次成为众多美国人的主要关切。在对公共问题的定期调查中,提到犯罪的人数比过去十年要多。在强大的法律和秩序呼吁下,1982年加利福尼亚州州长竞选在第11小时获胜。在许多人的研究中,刑事处罚是犯罪问题和社会努力解决犯罪问题的组成部分。它被视为对犯罪的现实和象征威慑,与流动,有效的警察部队一样重要。这导致了对量刑实践的重新审查和量刑规范的修订,最低刑罚的增加以及甚至新监狱的建设。例如,伊利诺伊州从量刑规则过渡到确定的量刑代码,废除了假释委员会,并颁布了X类立法,对某些令人发指的罪行规定了更严厉的刑罚。的确,伊利诺伊州经济和财政委员会的最新报告显示,美国矫正局在1983财年获得了所有新资本项目美元的75%?超过8000万美元。许多刑事法院的学生对这些改革的有效性表示怀疑。他们指出,最量刑决定的可见性很低,大多数刑事法院从业者对现状的既得利益。特别令人担忧的是,针对县级辩诉交易惯例的常规违规行为已经确立了很长的“涨幅”。 Tobetter了解量刑过程???并改善我们进行改革的机会???我们对刑事法院进行了长期的比较研究。本文的重点是影响量刑严重性的因素。当然,与增加量刑的威慑作用有关的人们特别喜欢这些因素。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nardulli Peter F.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1983
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号