首页> 外文OA文献 >Personal information organization and re-access in computer folders: an empirical study of information workers
【2h】

Personal information organization and re-access in computer folders: an empirical study of information workers

机译:个人信息组织和计算机文件夹中的重新访问:对信息工作者的实证研究

摘要

The current hierarchical folder system has long been found limited causing various difficulties in organizing and re-finding information on personal computers. Many alternative prototypes have been proposed to replace the current folder system. However, past empirical studies consistently observed that people prefer browsing folders in re-accessing information and only use searching as the last resort. Recognizing the complexity and our limited understanding of personal information organization and retrieval behavior in computer folders, my study was aimed to explore what people need from folders and the affordances and limitations of folders in the different stages of organization and retrieval, and furthermore provide implications for system design. Improved understanding on personal information organization and retrieval on computers is especially important today when personal information management (PIM) has entered public domain and the boundary between personal information management systems and general information systems becomes blurred. This multiple-case study investigated the participants??? information organization and retrieval behavior in their computer folders at four stages: keeping and discarding, organizing, re-organizing, and re-accessing. The difficulties they had at each stage were identified, and their computer folder structures and contents were analyzed. The participants include six PhD students and six administrative staff in an academic institution, with the former group representing the ???research??? end and the other one close to the ???administrative??? end in the activity spectrum proposed in (Bondarenko & Janssen, 2005). The data collection instruments include two rounds of in-depth semi-structured interviews, information re-access task observations, disk scans of several folders, and emails reporting re-access difficulties. The use of the two distinct groups of participants together with the multiple data sources and data collection methods provided rich and varied data for exploration and at the same time increased the opportunity to do triangulation in data analysis.The specific research questions include: 1) how do people keep and discard information items on computers, and what are on some people???s ???messy??? computer Desktops or in some ???messy??? folders? 2) From an integrative view, how do people organize information in computer folders, and what difficulties do they have in doing this? 3) What are the folder structures and contents like? 4) How do people re-organize folder structure and what difficulties do they have in doing this? 5) What are the tasks and strategies of re-accessing information on personal computers, and what difficulties do they have in re-accessing information? The result implies that: 1) people need an in-between mechanism for keeping or not keeping, as well as for discarding or not discarding a particular information item; 2) behind all the idiosyncratic folder creation behaviors, four elements are identified in how the participants organize information based on Hj??rland's typology of four views: rationalism, empiricism, pragmatism, and historicism; 3) the study identified two extreme types of folders in a spectrum ??? ???genre folders??? with no interfile relationships and ???project folders??? with complicated relationships between files, which can be partly attributed to the impact of using folders as workplaces. With all the three types of relationships identified in PREMIS observed in various ???project folders??? or folders close to this end, this study found that the various derivative relationships between files and/or groups of files led to the greatest difficulties for participants in finding and identifying files; 4) Behind the general browsing and search behaviors in folders, this study observed a re-access strategy similar to faceted navigation. The content analysis of the re-access difficulty examples reveals that the four FRBR tasks (finding, identifying, selecting and obtaining) in searching and making use of bibliographies and library catalogues also exist in information re-accessing on personal computers. This helps to define the ???re-access??? behavior on personal computers, and suggests the importance of the other tasks in addition to ???re-finding??? information.
机译:长期以来,发现当前的分层文件夹系统受到限制,导致在组织和重新查找个人计算机上的信息时遇到各种困难。已经提出了许多替代性的原型来替代当前的文件夹系统。但是,过去的经验研究一致观察到,人们在重新访问信息时更喜欢浏览文件夹,而仅将搜索作为最后的手段。认识到计算机文件夹中个人信息的组织和检索行为的复杂性和有限的理解,我的研究旨在探讨人们在组织和检索的不同阶段需要从文件夹中获得什么以及文件夹的承受能力和局限性,并为系统设计。当个人信息管理(PIM)进入公共领域并且个人信息管理系统与一般信息系统之间的界限变得模糊时,对个人信息的组织和在计算机上进行检索的进一步了解尤其重要。此多案例研究调查了参与者???信息在计算机文件夹中的组织和检索行为分为四个阶段:保留和丢弃,组织,重新组织和重新访问。确定了他们在每个阶段遇到的困难,并分析了他们的计算机文件夹结构和内容。参加者包括一所学术机构中的六名博士生和六名行政人员,前一组代表“研究”。结束,另一个接近“行政”在(Bondarenko&Janssen,2005)中提出的活动谱的末尾。数据收集工具包括两轮深入的半结构化访谈,信息重新访问任务观察,几个文件夹的磁盘扫描以及报告重新访问困难的电子邮件。使用两组不同的参与者以及多种数据源和数据收集方法可提供丰富多样的数据供探索,同时增加了在数据分析中进行三角剖分的机会。具体的研究问题包括:1)如何人们会在计算机上保留和丢弃信息项吗?有些人会发生什么?台式机或某些“杂乱”电脑文件夹? 2)从综合的角度来看,人们如何组织计算机文件夹中的信息,以及这样做有哪些困难? 3)文件夹的结构和内容如何? 4)人们如何重新组织文件夹结构,这样做有哪些困难? 5)在个人计算机上重新访问信息的任务和策略是什么,它们在重新访问信息方面有哪些困难?结果表明:1)人们需要一种保持或不保持以及丢弃或不丢弃特定信息项的中间机制; 2)在所有特有文件夹创建行为的背后,基于Hj?rland的四种观点的类型学,参与者如何组织信息中确定了四个要素:理性主义,经验主义,实用主义和历史主义; 3)研究确定了频谱中的两种极端文件夹类型? ???类型文件夹???没有文件间关系和“项目文件夹”文件之间的关系很复杂,这部分归因于将文件夹用作工作场所的影响。在各种“项目文件夹”中观察到的PREMIS中确定的所有三种关系。或靠近此文件夹的文件夹,此研究发现文件和/或文件组之间的各种派生关系导致参与者查找和识别文件的最大困难; 4)在文件夹中一般浏览和搜索行为的背后,该研究观察到类似于分面导航的重新访问策略。重新访问困难示例的内容分析表明,在个人计算机上的信息重新访问中,在搜索和利用书目和图书馆目录中的四个FRBR任务(查找,标识,选择和获取)也存在。这有助于定义“重新访问”在个人计算机上的行为,并建议除了“重新查找”以外,其他任务的重要性。信息。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zhang Hong;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号