首页> 外文OA文献 >Economics and how Obama could have lost the 2016 election too
【2h】

Economics and how Obama could have lost the 2016 election too

机译:经济学以及奥巴马也可能输掉2016年大选

摘要

Abstract. During the 2016 U.S. election, many voters from democratic (‘blue wall’)states, which have voted consistently in the past elections for the democrats, suddenly moved back into the Republican fold.  During this election, the primary economic issue was supposed to be NAFTA, both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump claimed it has been responsible for U.S. manufacturing job losses. So, what is the effect of trade on personal income and in particular manufacturing income and employment? Still, manufacturing losses are unlikely to explain democratic losses in rural areas, such as Wisconsin, where farm voters switched parties. What is the relationship between farm income and election result? Finally, are farmers Republican, Democrat or Independent?  Or just pragmatic?Keywords. Consumption, Martingale, Savings, Growth, Income, Election, Trade.JEL. E12, E21, J30, F41, B00.
机译:抽象。在2016年美国大选期间,许多民主(“蓝墙”)州的选民在过去的选举中对民主党进行了一致投票,但突然回到共和党席位。在这次大选期间,主要的经济问题本来应该是北美自由贸易协定,伯尼·桑德斯和唐纳德·特朗普都声称,这是造成美国制造业失业的原因。那么,贸易对个人收入,特别是制造业收入和就业有何影响?尽管如此,制造业损失不太可能解释农村地区的民主损失,例如威斯康星州,那里的农业选民参加了政党选举。农场收入和选举结果之间有什么关系?最后,农民是共和党,民主党还是独立的?还是务实?关键字。消费,Mar,储蓄,增长,收入,选举,贸易。 E12,E21,J30,F41,B00。

著录项

  • 作者

    WU Cheng K.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号