首页> 外文OA文献 >When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soilscontaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial
【2h】

When is a soil remediated? Comparison of biopiled and windrowed soilscontaminated with bunker-fuel in a full-scale trial

机译:什么时候修复土壤?生物堆放和土壤堆放比较在大规模试验中被船用燃料污染

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A six month field scale study was carried out to compare windrow turning andbiopile techniques for the remediation of soil contaminated with bunker C fueloil. End-point clean-up targets were defined by human risk assessment andecotoxicological hazard assessment approaches. Replicate windrows and biopileswere amended with either nutrients and inocula, nutrients alone or no amendment.In addition to fractionated hydrocarbon analysis, culturable microbialcharacterisation and soil ecotoxicological assays were performed. Thisparticular soil, heavy in texture and historically contaminated with bunker fuelwas more effectively remediated by windrowing, but coarser textures may be moreamendable to biopiling. This trial reveals the benefit of developing risk andhazard based approaches in defining end-point bioremediation of heavyhydrocarbons when engineered biopile or windrow are proposed as treatmentoption. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:进行了为期六个月的田间规模研究,以比较用料堆转弯和生物堆技术修复被船用碳燃料油污染的土壤。终点清理目标是通过人类风险评估和生态毒理危害评估方法确定的。用营养物和接种物修正复制的草堆和生物堆,单独使用营养物或不添加营养物。除了分馏碳氢化合物分析外,还进行了可培养的微生物特性分析和土壤生态毒理学测定。这种特殊的土壤质地较重,历史上曾被船用燃料污染,可以通过行草来更有效地修复,但较粗的质地可能更适合生物堆肥。该试验揭示了在提议将工程生物堆或堆肥作为治疗选择时,开发基于风险和危害的方法来定义重烃终点生物修复的好处。 (c)2010 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号