首页> 外文OA文献 >A structural design comparison of metallic and composite aircraft pressure retaining doors
【2h】

A structural design comparison of metallic and composite aircraft pressure retaining doors

机译:金属和复合飞机压力保持门的结构设计比较

摘要

The pressure retaining door is obviously a sensible part of an aircraft, and the design criteria is much more critical than for the fuselage, so a problem caused by this critical criteria is the heavy weight of the door structure because it should be strong enough to withstand loads and stiff enough to meet the sealing requirements.In spite of the pressure retaining door being so important, it is difficult to find design references. So, in this thesis, the pressure retaining door is investigated first, and then a typical structure of a type A door is selected as the study case using both metallic and composite material, in order to generate a standard method for door structure design, and to identify the key factors which can affect the structure weight.The study indicates that the structure weight of a type A door can be kept in a range for different combinations of beams and stringers, and the composite door structure can be 20% lighter than the metallic door while the stiffness of the two doors remains similar. It is found that the skin contributes much more weight to the door structure than other components and the skin thickness is affected by the short edge of the skin panel divided by beams and stringers.The results also found that it is much more serious when the end stop fails than when the middle stops fail.Therefore, it appears that the composite door is a good material as an alternative to aluminium. Also the method of door structure design is reasonable for the composite door, although it would be better to consider the stiffness of beams while in the theory design period.Besides IRP, the Group Design Project (GDP) is another important part of the MSc study; it lasts nearly half a year and we complete the Fly-wing concept design. The main contribution of the author to the GDP is the arrangement of doors, and also includes the family issues, cabin layout arrangement and a 3D model construct, which can be seen in APPENDIX B. According to the GDP work, I will have broadened my professional knowledge and will have an overall view of aircraft design.
机译:保压门显然是飞机的重要组成部分,其设计标准比机身要严格得多,因此,该关键标准引起的问题是门结构的重量很重,因为它应该足够坚固以承受尽管保压门非常重要,但很难找到设计参考。因此,在本文中,首先研究了保压门,然后以金属和复合材料为例,选择了典型的A型门结构作为研究案例,从而为门结构设计提供了标准方法,并且研究表明,对于不同的横梁和纵梁组合,A型门的结构重量可以保持在一定范围内,复合门的结构重量可以比A级门轻20%。金属门,而两个门的刚度保持相似。结果发现,皮肤对门结构的重量要比其他组件大得多,并且皮肤厚度受蒙皮板短边除以横梁和纵梁的影响,结果还发现端到端要严重得多。停止失败的次数要比中间停止失败的次数多。因此,复合门似乎是替代铝的一种很好的材料。门的结构设计方法对于复合门也是合理的,尽管在理论设计期间最好考虑梁的刚度。除IRP之外,群设计项目(GDP)是MSc研究的另一个重要部分;它持续了将近半年,我们完成了Fly-wing概念设计。作者对GDP的主要贡献是门的布置,并且还包括家庭问题,机舱布置和3D模型构造(请参见附录B)。根据GDP的工作,我将扩大我的研究范围。专业知识,并将对飞机设计有一个整体的了解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Liu Hongfen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号