首页> 外文OA文献 >An investigation into the categorisation of organisations to understand the potential barriers and motivations to certification of an environmental management system: BS EN ISO14001:2004
【2h】

An investigation into the categorisation of organisations to understand the potential barriers and motivations to certification of an environmental management system: BS EN ISO14001:2004

机译:对组织的分类进行调查以了解环境管理体系认证的潜在障碍和动机:BS EN ISO14001:2004

摘要

An investigation has been undertaken to ascertain the extent of the existingknowledge base regarding publically voluntary instruments capable ofsupporting organisations in developing improvements in environmentalmanagement. The multifaceted nature of the organisations seeking certificationmean a generic approach to implementation is unlikely to deliver the desiredafter results or a resource efficient approach. Furthermore, the diversity ofopinions recorded in the literature is often based on anecdotal evidence andsmall scale research projects. There is a lack of verifiable knowledge andunderstanding of the difficulties and barriers experienced by organisationsattempting to secure certification for existing voluntary instruments forenvironmental management such as ISO 14001.The aim of the Research:ISO 14001 is the fastest growing of the ISO Standards related to EnvironmentalManagement Systems; however existing research has been small scale andanecdotal. This research aims to confirm or dispute the present discussions andassumptions surrounding the motivations and barriers to certification to ISO14001. Through deductive reasoning this research will provide a comprehensiveinvestigation into the barriers and motivations experienced in itsimplementation. It is proposed that more comprehensive opportunities fororganisational categorisation may also be defined.The focus of the research has been to consider: The potential for integration of these voluntary instruments. The effects of the detailed requirements of the standard ISO 14001 on itscertification and implementation processes. The perceived and actual barriers to implementation The opportunities to categorise participating organisations accordingly.An analysis of instruments available to support organisations in improving theirenvironmental management has been undertaken. A complex and diverse arrayof instruments have been reviewed beyond the most regularly discussed ISO 14001. Considerable overlaps were identified in the requirements of the variousinstruments, suggesting opportunities for integration and resource efficiencies inimplementation which have not previously been investigated.A detailed review of the certification processes of over 850 organisationscertified to ISO 14001 was undertaken. This highlighted patterns in the barriersto implementation that have not previously been observed and which, in somecases, contradict existing literature.It has been shown that existing categorisation of originations was often only onthe basis of whether an organisation was an SME or NON SME. However, itwas proposed that this method lacked discrimination, with SME encompassing99.8% of private sector businesses in the UK. This research has elicitedsignificant motivations and barriers to EMS implementation and used these toprovide an objective basis to categorise organisations.The outcome of this research has been: A novel assessment of integration opportunities for 13 instruments. An objective review of the certification and implementation processes forISO 14001. The development of taxonomies that encompasses multiple criteria thatexhibit significant variability that could provide a method of classificationfor organisations.
机译:已经进行了调查,以确定有关能够支持组织发展环境管理的公共自愿工具的现有知识基础的范围。寻求认证的组织的多面性意味着实施的通用方法不太可能提供期望的结果或资源有效的方法。此外,文献中记载的观点的多样性通常基于轶事证据和小型研究项目。缺乏可验证的知识以及对组织试图获得现有的自愿性环境管理工具如ISO 14001的认证所遇到的困难和障碍的理解:研究的目标:ISO 14001是与环境管理系统相关的ISO标准中发展最快的;然而,现有的研究规模很小,而且传闻甚少。这项研究旨在确认或质疑围绕ISO14001认证动机和障碍的当前讨论和假设。通过演绎推理,本研究将对实施过程中遇到的障碍和动机进行全面研究。建议也可以定义组织分类的更全面的机会。研究的重点是考虑:这些自愿性工具整合的潜力。标准ISO 14001的详细要求对其认证和实施的影响实施过程中的感知障碍和实际障碍对参与组织进行相应分类的机会。进行了可用于支持组织改善其环境管理的手段的分析。除了最经常讨论的ISO 14001之外,还审查了一系列复杂而多样的工具。各种工具的要求中发现了相当多的重叠之处,这表明以前没有研究过的整合和资源效率实现的机会。对认证过程的详细审查开展了850多个通过ISO 14001认证的组织。这突显了壁垒实施中以前从未发现过的模式,在某些情况下与现有文献相矛盾。已经表明,现有的来源分类通常仅基于组织是中小企业还是非中小企业。但是,有人建议这种方法应避免歧视,中小企业占英国私人部门企业的99.8%。这项研究引起了实施EMS的巨大动机和障碍,并以此为组织分类提供了客观依据。这项研究的结果是:对13种工具的整合机会进行了新颖的评估。对认证和实施过程的客观审查forISO14001。分类法的发展涵盖了多个标准,这些标准显示出显着的可变性,可以为组织提供分类方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stevens P. A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号