首页> 外文OA文献 >Impact of clinical pharmacy interventions on medication error nodes
【2h】

Impact of clinical pharmacy interventions on medication error nodes

机译:临床药学干预措施对用药错误节点的影响

摘要

Background Pharmacists’ involvement in patient care has improved the quality of care and reduced medication errors. However, this has required a lot of work that could not have been accomplished without documentation of interventions. Several means of documenting errors have been proposed in the literature but without a consistent comprehensive process. Recently, the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) recognized that pharmacy practice lacks a consistent process for direct patient care and discussed several options for a pharmaceutical care plan, essentially encompassing medication therapy assessment, development and implementation of a pharmaceutical care plan and finally evaluation of the outcome. Therefore, as per the recommendations of ACCP, we sought to retrospectively analyze interventions by grouping them according to medication related problems (MRP) and their nodes such as prescribing; administering; monitoring; documenting and dispensing. Objective The aim of this study is to report interventions according to medication error (ME) nodes and show the impact of pharmacy interventions in reducing MRPs. Setting The study was conducted at the cardiology and infectious diseases services at a teaching hospital located in Beirut, Lebanon. Methods Intervention documentation was completed by pharmacy students on infectious diseases and cardiology rotations then reviewed by clinical pharmacists with respective specialties. Before data analysis, a new pharmacy reporting sheet was developed in order to link interventions according to MRP. Then, MRPs were grouped in the five ME nodes. During the documentation process, whether MRP had reached the patient or not may have not been reported which prevented the classification to the corresponding medication error nodes as ME. Main outcome Reduction in medication related problems across all ME nodes. Results A total of n = 1174 interventions were documented. N = 1091 interventions were classified as MRPs. Interventions were analyzed per 1000 patient days and resulted in 340 medication related problem/1000 patient days. A 72 % reduction in MRP across all ME nodes was seen. The majority of interventions were in the field of cardiology followed by infectious disease related. When interventions per ME nodes were analyzed, a high percentage of intervention acceptance was noted across all nodes especially prescribing (68.30 %) monitoring (77.7 %) and in documenting errors (79.36 %). Conclusion The role of pharmacists in reducing preventable MRPs can be shown when pharmacy interventions are analyzed according to corresponding MRP and ME nodes.
机译:背景技术药剂师参与患者护理改善了护理质量并减少了用药错误。但是,这需要大量工作,如果没有干预文档的记录,这些工作是无法完成的。文献中已经提出了几种记录错误的方法,但是没有一个一致的综合过程。最近,美国临床药学学院(ACCP)认识到药学实践缺乏直接患者护理的一致过程,并讨论了药物护理计划的几种选择,主要包括药物治疗评估,药物护理计划的制定和实施以及最终评估结果。因此,根据ACCP的建议,我们试图通过根据药物相关问题(MRP)及其诸如处方的节点对干预进行分组,从而对这些干预进行回顾性分析。管理;监控;记录和分配。目的这项研究的目的是根据药物错误(ME)节点报告干预措施,并显示药物干预措施对降低MRP的影响。设置背景该研究是在位于黎巴嫩贝鲁特的教学医院的心脏病学和传染病服务部门进行的。方法药房学生完成了有关传染病和心脏病学轮换的干预文献,然后由临床药剂师进行了专门研究。在进行数据分析之前,为了根据MRP链接干预措施,开发了新的药房报告表。然后,将MRP分为五个ME节点。在记录过程中,可能尚未报告MRP是否已到达患者,这阻止了将相应的药物错误节点分类为ME。主要结果减少了所有ME节点中与药物相关的问题。结果总共记录了n = 1174项干预措施。 N = 1091干预措施被归类为MRP。每1000患者日分析干预一次,每1000患者日导致340例与药物相关的问题。观察到所有ME节点的MRP降低了72%。大多数干预措施是在心脏病学领域,其次是传染病。在分析每个ME节点的干预措施时,在所有节点上都注意到很高的干预措施接受率,尤其是规定(68.30%)监测(77.7%)和记录错误(79.36%)。结论通过根据相应的MRP和ME节点分析药物干预措施,可以证明药剂师在减少可预防的MRP中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号