首页> 外文OA文献 >The expansion of low cost carriers into the long-haul market: a strategic analysis of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA
【2h】

The expansion of low cost carriers into the long-haul market: a strategic analysis of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA

机译:将低成本航空公司扩展到长途市场:挪威航空航天飞机ASA的战略分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The low-cost carrier (“LCC”) business model has been in existence for several decades and theirmarket share has been growing steadily. However, the most successful LCCs such as Southwest,Ryanair and EasyJet have focused upon implementing the low-cost strategy on short-haul routes.The main strategic objective of this thesis is to identify the underlying reasons for this phenomenonand whether there is a potential for the exploitation of the low-cost business model on long-haulflights. With this objective in mind, we conducted a case study of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA(“NAS”), a LCC originating from Norway, and the only LCC currently operating long-haul routesfrom Europe to North America and Asia.The thesis is structured around three main parts; Literature Review, External Analysis andInternal Analysis. The Literature Review provides the theoretical background. The External Analysischapter is split in two. Firstly, we use the PESTLE model to identify the major macroeconomicfactors directly influencing the airline industry. Then we move to the microenvironment analysis thatutilises the Porter’s Five Forces framework to provide a summary of the key issues shaping industryprofitability. The third part, Internal Analysis provides an overview of the company’s history,financial performance and operational strategies in its long-haul expansion. The Chapter ends with aSWOT analysis to distinguish the key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing NAS.Ultimately, the VRIO analysis finds that NAS currently lacks the resources to create and maintainsustainable competitive advantages in the long-haul market.In fact, the company has even failed to gain a significant price advantage over its competitors,especially when its LowFare+ product is compared with the fares of legacy airlines offering indirectservices. As such, we conclude the thesis with a Recommendations section, where we proposeseveral strategic solutions that may improve NAS’ financial and operational performance on its longhaulroutes.
机译:低成本运营商(LCC)业务模型已经存在了数十年,其市场份额一直在稳定增长。但是,西南航空,瑞安航空和EasyJet等最成功的低成本航空公司都将重点放在短途航线的低成本战略上。本论文的主要战略目标是查明造成这种现象的根本原因以及是否有潜力在长焦灯上开发低成本的商业模式。出于这一目标,我们对挪威航空航天飞机ASA(NAS)进行了案例研究,这是一个起源于挪威的LCC,也是目前唯一运营从欧洲到北美和亚洲的长途航线的LCC。三个主要部分;文献综述,外部分析和内部分析。文献综述提供了理论背景。外部分析章节分为两部分。首先,我们使用PESTLE模型确定直接影响航空业的主要宏观经济因素。然后,我们进入微环境分析,该分析利用了波特的五力框架,以总结影响行业盈利能力的关键问题。第三部分,内部分析概述了公司的长期发展历史,财务业绩和运营策略。本章以SWOT分析结束,以区分NAS面临的主要优势,劣势,机会和威胁.VRIO分析最终发现,NAS目前缺乏在长途市场上创造和维持可持续竞争优势的资源。甚至没有获得比竞争对手更大的价格优势,尤其是将LowFare +产品与提供间接服务的传统航空公司的票价进行比较时。因此,本文以“建议”部分作为结束语,在此我们提出了各种战略解决方案,可以改善NAS的长途航线的财务和运营绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号