首页> 外文OA文献 >The Expansion of English-medium Instruction in the Nordic Countries.Can Top-Down University Language Polices Encourage Bottom-up Disciplinary Literacy Goals?
【2h】

The Expansion of English-medium Instruction in the Nordic Countries.Can Top-Down University Language Polices Encourage Bottom-up Disciplinary Literacy Goals?

机译:自上而下的大学语言警察可以鼓励自下而上的学科扫盲目标吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Recently, in the wake of the Bologna Declaration and similar internationalinitiatives, there has been a rapid increase in the number of university courses and programmestaught through the medium of English. Surveys have consistently shown theNordic countries to be at the forefront of this trend towards English-medium instruction(EMI). In this paper, we discuss the introduction of EMI in four Nordic countries (Denmark,Finland, Norway and Sweden). We present the educational setting and the EMIdebate in each of these countries and summarize relevant research findings. We then makesome tentative suggestions for the introduction of EMI in higher education in othercountries. In particular, we are interested in university language policies and their relevancefor the day-to-day work of faculty. We problematize one-size-fits-all universitylanguage policies, suggesting that in order for policies to be seen as relevant they need tobe flexible enough to take into account disciplinary differences. In this respect, we makesome specific suggestions about the content of university language policies and EMI coursesyllabuses. Here we recommend that university language policies should encourage thediscussion of disciplinary literacy goals and require course syllabuses to detail disciplinaryspecificlanguage-learning outcomes.
机译:摘要最近,随着《博洛尼亚宣言》和类似国际倡议的实施,以英语为媒介的大学课程和课程的数量迅速增加。调查始终表明,北欧国家处于这种向英语中等教学(EMI)发展的趋势的最前沿。在本文中,我们讨论了在四个北欧国家(丹麦,芬兰,挪威和瑞典)中引入EMI的问题。我们介绍了这些国家/地区的教育背景和EMI辩论,并总结了相关研究结果。然后,我们为在其他国家的高等教育中引入EMI提出了一些初步的建议。特别是,我们对大学语言政策及其与教师日常工作的相关性感兴趣。我们对一种适合所有大学的语言政策提出了质疑,建议为了使政策被视为相关政策,它们必须足够灵活以考虑学科差异。在这方面,我们对大学语言政策和EMI课程大纲的内容提出了一些具体建议。在这里,我们建议大学语言政策应鼓励讨论学科素养目标,并要求课程提纲详细说明学科特定的语言学习成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号