首页> 外文OA文献 >Finding the Right Yardstick: Regulation under Heterogeneous Environments
【2h】

Finding the Right Yardstick: Regulation under Heterogeneous Environments

机译:寻找正确的标尺:异构环境下的法规

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Revenue cap regulation is often combined with systematic benchmarking to reveal the managerial inefficiencies when regulating natural monopolies. One example is the European energy sector, where benchmarking methods are based on actual cost data, which are influenced by managerial inefficiency as well as operational heterogeneity. This paper demonstrates how a conditional nonparametric method, whichallows the comparison of firms operating under heterogeneous technologies, can be used to estimate managerial inefficiency. A dataset of 123 distribution firms in Norway is used to show aggregate and firm-specific effects of conditioning. By comparing the unconditional model to our proposed conditional model and the model presently used by the Norwegian regulator, we see that the use of conditional benchmarking methods in revenue cap regulation may effectively distinguish between managerial inefficiency and operational heterogeneity. This distinction leads first to a decrease in aggregate efficient costs and second to a reallocation effect that affects the relative profitability of firms and relative customer prices, thus providing a fairer basis for setting revenue caps.
机译:收入上限监管通常与系统基准进行组合,以揭示监管自然垄断时的管理效率低下。欧洲能源部门就是一个例子,基准方法是基于实际成本数据的,该数据受管理效率低下和运营异质性的影响。本文证明了有条件的非参数方法可以用来评估管理效率低下的情况,该方法可以比较在异构技术下运营的公司。挪威的123家分销公司的数据集用于显示条件调节的总和和公司特定的影响。通过将无条件模型与我们提出的条件模型和挪威监管机构目前使用的模型进行比较,我们看到在收入上限监管中使用条件基准化方法可以有效地区分管理效率低下和运营异质性。这种区别首先导致总的有效成本降低,其次导致重新分配效应,这会影响企业的相对获利能力和相对客户价格,从而为设定收入上限提供了更公平的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号