首页> 外文OA文献 >Investigating the possible causal association of smoking with depression and anxiety using Mendelian randomisation meta-analysis: the CARTA consortium
【2h】

Investigating the possible causal association of smoking with depression and anxiety using Mendelian randomisation meta-analysis: the CARTA consortium

机译:使用孟德尔随机荟萃分析调查吸烟与抑郁症和焦虑症之间的可能因果关系:CARTA联盟

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: To investigate whether associations of smoking with depression and anxiety are likely to be causal, using a Mendelian randomisation approach. Design: Mendelian randomisation meta-analyses using a genetic variant (rs16969968/rs1051730) as a proxy for smoking heaviness, and observational meta-analyses of the associations of smoking status and smoking heaviness with depression, anxiety and psychological distress. Participants: Current, former and never smokers of European ancestry aged ≥16 years from 25 studies in the Consortium for Causal Analysis Research in Tobacco and Alcohol (CARTA). Primary outcome measures: Binary definitions of depression, anxiety and psychological distress assessed by clinical interview, symptom scales or self-reported recall of clinician diagnosis. Results: The analytic sample included up to 58 176 never smokers, 37 428 former smokers and 32 028 current smokers (total N=127 632). In observational analyses, current smokers had 1.85 times greater odds of depression (95% CI 1.65 to 2.07), 1.71 times greater odds of anxiety (95% CI 1.54 to 1.90) and 1.69 times greater odds of psychological distress (95% CI 1.56 to 1.83) than never smokers. Former smokers also had greater odds of depression, anxiety and psychological distress than never smokers. There was evidence for positive associations of smoking heaviness with depression, anxiety and psychological distress (ORs per cigarette per day: 1.03 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.04), 1.03 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.04) and 1.02 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.03) respectively). In Mendelian randomisation analyses, there was no strong evidence that the minor allele of rs16969968/rs1051730 was associated with depression (OR=1.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.05), anxiety (OR=1.02, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.07) or psychological distress (OR=1.02, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.06) in current smokers. Results were similar for former smokers. Conclusions: Findings from Mendelian randomisation analyses do not support a causal role of smoking heaviness in the development of depression and anxiety.
机译:目的:使用孟德尔随机方法研究吸烟与抑郁症和焦虑症的关联是否可能是因果关系。设计:孟德尔随机荟萃分析使用遗传变异(rs16969968 / rs1051730)作为吸烟量的替代指标,并对吸烟状况和吸烟量与抑郁,焦虑和心理困扰的关联进行观察性荟萃分析。参与者:烟酒因果分析研究联合会(CARTA)中的25项研究中年龄在≥16岁的欧洲血统的当前,以往和从未吸烟者。主要结局指标:通过临床访谈,症状量表或自我报告的临床医生诊断评估来评估抑郁,焦虑和心理困扰的二进制定义。结果:分析样本包括多达58 176从未吸烟者,37 428以前的吸烟者和32 028当前的吸烟者(总N = 127 632)。在观察性分析中,当前吸烟者的抑郁几率是1.85倍(95%CI为1.65至2.07),焦虑率是1.71倍(95%CI为1.54至1.90)和心理困扰的几率是1.69倍(95%CI为1.56至1.65)。 1.83)比从未吸烟者。与从不吸烟者相比,前吸烟者患抑郁,焦虑和心理困扰的几率更大。有证据表明吸烟量与抑郁,焦虑和心理困扰呈正相关(每支香烟每天的OR分别为1.03(95%CI 1.02至1.04),1.03(95%CI 1.02至1.04)和1.02(95%CI 1.02至1.02) 1.03))。在孟德尔随机分析中,没有强有力的证据表明rs16969968 / rs1051730的次要等位基因与抑郁症(OR = 1.00,95%CI 0.95至1.05),焦虑症(OR = 1.02,95%CI 0.97至1.07)或心理相关当前吸烟者的困扰(OR = 1.02,95%CI 0.98至1.06)。前吸烟者的结果相似。结论:孟德尔随机分析的结果不支持吸烟沉重在抑郁症和焦虑症发展中的因果作用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号