首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of numerical schemes for nonlinear 1-D arterial blood flow modeling
【2h】

Comparison of numerical schemes for nonlinear 1-D arterial blood flow modeling

机译:非线性一维动脉血流建模数值方案的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this Thesis, the numerical methods used in STARFiSh (MacCormack or McC) have been tested and compared with five other state of the art flow-solvers: discontinuous Galerkin (DCG), locally conservative Galerkin (LCG), Galerkin least-squares finite element method (FEM), finite volume method (FVM), and a simplified trapezium rule method (STM). Comparisons are made in a series of six benchmark test cases with an increasing degree of complexity. The tests revealed limitations in the original implementation of STARFiSh. The original MacCormack scheme was not implemented correctly, which resulted in discontinuities between boundary and field nodes. The scheme also proved to be non-conservative in cases with big relative weight on the convective term. The original linear bifurcation model gave rise to discrepancies in networks with big changes in dynamic pressure. As a result a new conservative solving scheme, and a new bifurcation model was implemented. The implementations have been validated in the comparison with the five other flow solvers, and in additional cases where analytical solutions exist.The thesis has evolved around a joint project to form the article "Comparison1D-scheme". The tests, results and findings have been conducted to contribute with STARFiSh's part of the article. The accuracy of the numerical schemes is assessed by comparison against theoretical results, 3-D data in compatible domains with distensible walls, or experimental data in a network of silicone tubes. Results show a good agreement among all numerical schemesand their ability to capture the main features of pressure, flow and area waveforms in large arteries.Grid tests show that for the physiological cases where the wave length is long comparing with each vessel segment, low CFL numbers can be tolerated without introduction of significant diffusive and dispersive errors for STARFiSh solutions.A model which integrates Womersley theory for pulsatile pipe flow with One-dimensional (1-D) compliant vessel flow, have been established. The solutions using Womersley theory for estimating the velocity profile, and it's subsequent effect on convective- and friction term have been compared with solutions using an assumed velocity profile. The solution using Womersley theory did not yield better results comparing with 3-D numerical data, in a single vessel test replicating blood flow in the upper thoracic aorta.
机译:在本论文中,已经测试了STARFiSh(MacCormack或McC)中使用的数值方法,并将其与其他五个最新的流动求解器进行了比较:不连续的Galerkin(DCG),局部保守的Galerkin(LCG),Galerkin最小二乘有限元方法(FEM),有限体积方法(FVM)和简化的梯形规则方法(STM)。在一系列六个基准测试用例中进行了比较,其复杂程度不断提高。测试揭示了STARFiSh的原始实施中的局限性。最初的MacCormack方案未正确实施,这导致边界节点和现场节点之间不连续。在对流项上相对权重较大的情况下,该方案也被证明是非保守的。最初的线性分叉模型引起了动态压力变化较大的网络差异。结果,实现了新的保守求解方案和新的分叉模型。通过与其他五个流量求解器进行比较,并在存在分析解决方案的其他情况下,对实现进行了验证。本文围绕一个联合项目发展而来,形成了文章“ Comparison1D-scheme”。测试,结果和发现已经为STARFiSh的文章做出了贡献。通过与理论结果,具有可扩展壁的兼容区域中的3-D数据或硅酮管网络中的实验数据进行比较,可以评估数值方案的准确性。结果表明所有数值方案之间都有很好的一致性,并且它们能够捕获大动脉中压力,流量和面积波形的主要特征。网格测试表明,在生理情况下,与每个血管段相比,波长长,CFL值低可以容忍STARFiSh解决方案而不会引入明显的扩散和色散误差。建立了一个模型,该模型将Womersley脉动管流理论与一维(1-D)顺应性容器流相结合。使用沃默斯利(Womersley)理论估算速度分布的解及其对对流和摩擦项的后续影响已与使用假定速度分布的解进行了比较。使用Womersley理论的解决方案在复制上胸主动脉血流的单血管试验中,与3-D数值数据相比,没有产生更好的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fossan Fredrik Eikeland;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号