首页> 外文OA文献 >Privacy and Property in the Biobank Context
【2h】

Privacy and Property in the Biobank Context

机译:生物银行背景下的隐私和财产

摘要

The papers in this special thematic issue of HEC Forum critically andcarefully explore key issues at the intersection of patient privacy and commodification.For example, should hospitals be required to secure a person’s consent to anypossible uses to which his discarded body parts might be put after his treatment orshould it only be concerned with securing his informed consent to his treatment?Should a hospital be required to raise the possibility of the commodification of such(patient-discarded) body parts, or should it only be required to address this issue ifthe patient asks about it? Should persons be paid to engage in medical research, orshould they only be compensated for their time, on the grounds, perhaps, that suchpayment would be coercive or exploitative, for it might move some persons to agreeto participate in research who otherwise would not have done? This number of HECForum illustrates the widespread implications of these issues upon which healthcareethics committees are called to deliberate.
机译:在HEC论坛的这一专题主题中的论文批判性地仔细研究了患者隐私和商品化的交汇处的关键问题,例如,是否应要求医院确保患者同意将其丢弃的身体部位用于他的任何可能用途?治疗还是仅应在获得知情同意的情况下进行治疗?是否应要求医院提高此类(患者丢弃的)身体部位商品化的可能性,或者仅应患者要求解决此问题关于它?应该给某人从事医学研究的报酬,还是仅应根据他们的时间获得报酬,也许是因为这种报酬将是强制性的或剥削性的,因为这可能会使某些人同意参加研究,而他们本来不会这样做的? HECForum的数量说明了这些问题的广泛影响,要求医疗伦理委员会对此进行审议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ursin Lars Øystein;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号