首页> 外文OA文献 >The Commission’s internal conditions for social re-regulation: Market efficiency and wider social goals in setting the rules of financial services in Europe
【2h】

The Commission’s internal conditions for social re-regulation: Market efficiency and wider social goals in setting the rules of financial services in Europe

机译:欧盟委员会进行社会重新监管的内部条件:制定欧洲金融服务规则时的市场效率和更广泛的社会目标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With its scarce budgetary resources and institutional logics favouring market-based problemsolving,the European Union (EU) has been considered a prime example of the regulatorystate. When and how can we expect the Commission to pursue aims beyond the mere increaseof efficiency in private market transactions? Can we expect Brussels to intervene wheresocietal interests demand re-regulation?We draw up two ideal-type perspectives on market regulation and trace them empiricallyalong two regulatory processes concerning financial services: consumer credit regulation andequal treatment in financial services, selected as recent instruments focussing explicitly onpresumably weaker parts in market transactions. Regulatory decisions are reconstructed alongsemi-structured interviews with Commission officials from different DGs and hierarchicallevels conducted 2006-2009.In both cases the Commission went beyond mere market-efficiency and changed the qualityof the financial market by favouring disadvantaged societal groups in its regulatory proposals.Our process analyses suggest that there is a scope for a regulatory equality enhancing policywhich depends on pro-active agents within the Commission, the possibility to frameregulatory beneficiaries as market participants, and the re-distribution of rights instead ofresources.
机译:凭借其稀少的预算资源和有利于解决基于市场的问题的体制逻辑,欧洲联盟(EU)被认为是监管国家的主要例子。我们何时以及如何期望委员会追求超越仅仅提高私募市场交易效率的目标?我们能否期望布鲁塞尔干预社会利益需求的重新监管?我们就市场监管提出两种理想类型的观点,并在涉及金融服务的两种监管过程中从经验上追踪它们:消费者信贷监管和金融服务中的平等待遇,被选为近期明确关注的工具大概是市场交易中较弱的部分。在2006年至2009年期间,通过与来自不同DG和等级级别的委员会官员进行的半结构化访谈,重构了监管决策。在这两种情况下,委员会都超越了单纯的市场效率,并通过在监管建议中偏向弱势社会群体来改变金融市场的质量。流程分析表明,有一个监管平等促进政策的空间,该政策取决于委员会内部的积极主体,建立监管受益人作为市场参与者的可能性以及权利的重新分配而不是资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号