首页> 外文OA文献 >Downsizing as a sorting device : are low-productive workers more likely to leave downsizing firms?
【2h】

Downsizing as a sorting device : are low-productive workers more likely to leave downsizing firms?

机译:缩小规模作为分类工具:低生产率的工人是否更有可能离开缩小规模的公司?

摘要

Abstract:Employers cannot always displace workers at their own discretion. In many countries, Employment Protection Legislation (EPL) includes restrictions on laying off workers. This paper studies whether employers use downsizing events, where the rules for dismissal differ from the rules that apply for individual dismissal, to displace workers selectively. We investigate empirically whether workers with low expected productivity relative to co-workers face particularly high exit risks when establishments downsize. Our evidence is consistent with establishments using downsizings as a sorting device to terminate the employment of the least profitable workers who are protected against dismissal under normal times of operation. However, only a minor share of the displacements in downsizings may be attributed to opportunistic sorting by employers, suggesting that EPL may not be an important obstacle to firms’ firing of individual workers. Keywords: Downsizing, sickness absence, employment protection
机译:摘要:雇主不能总是自行决定更换工人。在许多国家,《就业保护法》(EPL)包括对解雇工人的限制。本文研究了雇主是否使用裁员事件(有条件的解雇规则与适用于个人解雇的规则不同)来选择性地安置工人。我们根据经验进行调查,当机构规模缩小时,相对于同事而言,预期生产率低的工人是否面临特别高的退出风险。我们的证据与企业使用裁员作为分类工具来终止利润最低的工人的雇佣的企业一致,这些工人在正常的营业时间受到保护免遭解雇。但是,在裁员中,只有很小一部分是因为雇主进行了机会主义的分类,这表明EPL可能不是公司解雇单个工人的重要障碍。关键字:裁员,缺病,就业保护

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号