首页> 外文OA文献 >A review of the research in testing in secondary chemistry and physics from 1938-1948 including 14 reviews of standardized tests.

【2h】

A review of the research in testing in secondary chemistry and physics from 1938-1948 including 14 reviews of standardized tests.

机译：1938-1948年对中学化学和物理测试研究的回顾，其中包括14篇标准化测试的评论。

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Thesis (M.A.)--Boston UniversityN.B.: Pages 16,17 missing from the originals.

机译：论文（硕士）-波士顿大学（美国）波士顿：原著缺少第16,17页。

著录项

作者
Dubins M. Ira.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 1949
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 en_US
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Review of pulp sensibility tests. Part I: general information and thermal tests. [J] . Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV International endodontic journal . 2010,第9期

机译：纸浆敏感性测试的回顾。第一部分：一般信息和热测试。
2. Respiratory patterns in panic disorder reviewed: a focus on biological challenge tests. [J] . Niccolai V, van Duinen MA, Griez EJ Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica . 2009,第3期

机译：回顾了恐慌症的呼吸模式：以生物学挑战测试为重点。
3. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. [J] . Lijmer JG, Bossuyt PM, Heisterkamp SH Statistics in medicine . 2002,第11期

机译：在诊断测试的系统评价中探索异质性的来源。
4. Reviewing mobile bed tests. From the conceptual design to the interpretation of results. [C] . Sanchez-Arcilla A., Caceres I., Van Rijn L., Canadian Hydrotechnical Conference . 2009

机译：审查手机床测试。从概念设计到结果的解释。
5. An evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus knowledge and information processing for herd and cow-level decision-making: (a) Staphylococcus aureus-specific antibody test. (b) Processing diagnostic test information. (c) Literature review of Staphylococcus aureus-specific knowledge: (i) Cow-level diagnostic tests. (ii) Herd-level diagnostic tests. (iii) Decision dynamics and efficacy [D] . Costello, Sandra Swindell 1998

机译：评价金黄色葡萄球菌在牛群和奶牛一级决策中的知识和信息处理：（a）金黄色葡萄球菌特异性抗体测试。（b）处理诊断测试信息。（c）有关金黄色葡萄球菌特定知识的文献综述：（i）母牛水平的诊断测试。（ii）牧群水平的诊断测试。（iii）决策动态和效力
6. Do Author-Suggested Reviewers Rate Submissions More Favorably than Editor-Suggested Reviewers? A Study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics [O] . Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel 2010

机译：作者建议的审稿人对稿件的评价是否比作者建议的审稿人更优惠？大气化学与物理研究
7. The Framingham Offspring Study: a commentary1150th AnniversaryHistorical ArticleINTRODUCTIONIn this edition of the Journal, we release the fifth in a series of reviews of influential articles that have been previously published in ACC journals, including the American Journal of Cardiology(from 1958 to 1982) and JACC(from 1983 to the present). The publication of these articles is only one aspect of the ACC’s 50th anniversary commemoration, which highlights 50 years of leadership in cardiovascular care and education. The articles are intended to encourage reflection on the remarkable progress made in cardiovascular medicine over time, as well as to acknowledge the amazing prescience of some early investigators in anticipating and, in many cases, later guiding developments in their field.The working group responsible for selecting these articles and asking reviewers to write editorials solicited suggestions from the ACC’s clinical committees and individual members.The group achieved consensus fairly easily, including whom the group should ask to prepare the accompanying editorials. We initially drew up a list of 14 general areas to cover in this series, but later found that there are several major areas of modern cardiology, prominently molecular cardiology, in which the truly landmark articles have, alas, not yet been published in JACC. Therefore, the working group decided not to categorize by subject, but instead, to concentrate on the most important articles.The working group, a task force of the Subcommittee for the Commemoration of the ACC 50th Anniversary, owes a great deal to Ms. May A. Roustom and the efficient and tireless staff at Heart House for facilitating this project. We also wish to thank all who suggested articles and, most important, the authors who prepared reviews for their willingness to contribute their time and wisdom.Influential Articles in JACC Working GroupSharon A. Hunt, M.D., F.A.C.C.Rick A. Nishimura, M.D., F.A.C.C.H.J.C. Swan, M.D., Ph.D., M.A.C.C.Michael J. Wolk, M.D., F.A.C.C. [O] . Swan H.J.C 1999

机译：弗雷明汉后代研究：1150周年历史文章引言在本期杂志中，我们发布了一系列有影响力的文章的第五篇评论，这些评论先前已在ACC期刊上发表，包括《美国心脏病学杂志》（1958年至1982年）和《美国心脏病学会杂志》（从1983年至今）。这些文章的发表只是ACC成立50周年纪念的一个方面，该纪念日着重介绍了心血管护理和教育领域50年的领导地位。这些文章旨在鼓励人们对心血管医学随着时间的推移所取得的显着进展进行反思，并承认一些早期研究人员在预见并在许多情况下为他们领域的发展提供指导的惊人先见之明。选择这些文章并要求审稿人撰写社论，征求ACC临床委员会和个人成员的建议。该小组相当容易达成共识，包括该小组应要求谁准备随附的社论。我们最初拟出了本系列文章涵盖的14个常规领域的清单，但后来发现现代心脏病学有几个主要领域，主要是分子心脏病学，可惜的是，真正的具有里程碑意义的文章尚未在JACC上发表。因此，工作组决定不按主题进行分类，而是专注于最重要的文章。工作组是ACC成立50周年纪念小组委员会的一个工作组，在很大程度上要归功于梅女士。 A. Roustom和Heart House高效而孜孜不倦的员工为该项目提供了便利。我们还要感谢所有提出建议的文章，最重要的是感谢准备撰写评论以贡献自己的时间和智慧的作者.JACC工作组的有影响力的文章Sharon A. Swan，M.D.，Ph.D.，M.A.C.C. Michael J.Wolk，M.D.，F.A.C.C.
8. ACV Cushion Comparison Tests. Preliminary Review and Definition of Model and Tests. [R] . 1979

机译：aCV坐垫比较测试。模型和测试的初步审查和定义。

A review of the research in testing in secondary chemistry and physics from 1938-1948 including 14 reviews of standardized tests.

摘要

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅