首页> 外文OA文献 >Training for developing reading comprehension and reading for learning
【2h】

Training for developing reading comprehension and reading for learning

机译:培养阅读理解能力和阅读学习能力的培训

摘要

udUnderstanding a readed text is the aim of reading at school. A reader reads to understand the meaning of a readed text and possibly use acquired informations in new sizuations. Student books and other written material is commonly used at schools. Reading comprehension difficulties lead toward loweer grades and consequently, to learning insuccess.udAmong students whit reading comprehension difficulties are some whit lacks in specific learning areas, such as difficulties at reading and writting like students whit speech and language disabilities. To provide an according help and support is fundamental to understand reading comprehension factors,ud udThis thesis aim is to improve reading comprehension by using the Carol Golfus method which included Metacognitive-inter-sentential model of reading comprehension (in Košak Babuder, 2012). Special program leans on developing reading comprehension using texts while developing several reading skills and metacognitive awareness (Košak Babuder, 2012). Specific training included 15 meetings in a 3 months period. The experimental group 1 was consisted by 3 pupils – two of them with specific reading difficulties and one with speech and language disorder, the experimental group 2 was consisted by 3 pupils with no learning difficulties. The control group 1 was also consisted by 3 pupils - two of them with specific reading difficulties and one with speech and language disorder, the control group 2 was consisted by 3 pupils with no learning difficulties. Before and after the training all the pupils were tested with ACADIA subtests (Atkinson, Jonston in Lindsay, 1972), test for recognizing reading and writing disabilities (Šali, 1973), reading comprehension test using the text entitled Morski pes išče prijatelja (Elley, Gradišar in Lapajne, 1995) and metacognitive awareness questionar by Miholic (1994, v Pečjak, 2010). Results achieved from the first and second testing taken in experimental group 1 and 2 were compared with results from control group 1 and 2, were no training was performed. ududFinal results show pupils from experimental group achieved a bigger improvement on all the tests compared with pupils from control group were no training was performed. Pupils in experimental group show bigger improvement on auditory memory, vocabulary knowledge, decoding skills and fluency subtests, which have a major impact on reading comprehension. The biggest improvement was made by pupils with no learning difficulties although with a major motivation, focus and determination. udPupils in control group 1 and 2 show minimal or same results as in first testing. Pupils from control group 2 with no learning difficulties even worsen their results on auditory memory test. The result decreased for 4, 67 average points. Pupils in control group 1 have achieved lower results on Besede 1 and Besede 2 tests. In fact, bigger decoding and reading fluency difficulties are noticeable. Fluency appears particularly critical. In fact, reading was slowly proceeding and a lot of mistakes were made. Considering results pupils in control group could improve skills if they were included in training. ududOn basis of the research taken on 6 pupils – 3 with learning disabilities and 3 with no learning disabilities, from two 5th grade classes is possible to conclude major attention has to be given on elements influencing reading comprehension, which can be improved by reading comprehension training, especially on pupils with learning difficulties. Successful reading comprehension is correlated with awareness and correct use of metacognitive strategies before, during and after reading, all skills achieved with the training, which includes Metacognitive-inter-sentential model of reading comprehension. The training appears to has a positive impact. Pupils meliorated reading comprehension, metacognitive strategies and some cognitive skills (decoding, fluency, vocabulary, language skills, ecc.). The results of this research show the need of including this type of training in school programs. ud
机译:ud了解阅读的文字是在学校阅读的目的。读者阅读以理解阅读文本的含义,并可能在新的出版物中使用获得的信息。学生书籍和其他书面材料通常在学校使用。阅读理解困难会导致低年级,从而导致学习成绩下降。 ud学生在阅读方面的理解困难是某些特定学习领域缺乏的,例如阅读和写作方面的困难,例如学生的言语和语言障碍。提供相应的帮助和支持是理解阅读理解因素的基础, ud ud本文旨在通过使用包括阅读理解的元认知-句际模型的Carol Golfus方法来提高阅读理解(在KošakBabuder,2012年) 。特别计划的重点是在发展几种阅读技巧和元认知意识的同时,利用课文发展阅读理解能力(KošakBabuder,2012)。具体培训包括为期3个月的15次会议。实验组1由3名学生组成,其中2名有特定阅读困难,一名语言和语言障碍,实验组2由3名没有学习困难的学生组成。对照组1也由3名学生组成-其中2名有特定阅读困难,另一名患有语言障碍和语言障碍,对照组2由3名没有学习困难的学生组成。在训练前后,所有学生都接受了ACADIA子测验(阿特金森,林赛的琼斯顿,1972年),识别阅读和写作障碍的测验(Šali,1973年),阅读理解测验,并使用了标题为Morski pesiščeprijatelja的文字(Elley, Gradišar在Lapajne,1995年)和元认知意识问答由Miholic提出(1994年,Pečjak,2010年)。将实验组1和2进行的第一次和第二次测试获得的结果与对照组1和2进行了比较,没有进行任何训练。 ud ud最终结果显示,与未进行训练的对照组相比,实验组的学生在所有测试中均取得了更大的进步。实验组的学生在听觉记忆,词汇知识,解码技能和流利度子测验方面显示出更大的进步,这对阅读理解产生了重大影响。最大的进步来自没有学习困难的学生,尽管他们具有主要的动机,专注力和决心。 ud对照组1和2中的学生显示的结果与首次测试中的结果极少或相同。没有学习困难的对照组2的学生在听觉记忆测试中的结果甚至更差。结果下降了4,平均67分。对照组1中的学生在Besede 1和Besede 2测试中获得了较低的结果。实际上,更大的解码和阅读流畅度困难是显而易见的。流利度显得尤为关键。实际上,阅读进展缓慢,并且犯了很多错误。考虑到结果,如果将对照组的学生包括在内,他们可以提高技能。 ud ud根据对6名小学生的研究-3名有学习障碍的学生和3名没有学习障碍的学生,可以得出两个五年级的结论,那就是必须对影响阅读理解的要素给予主要关注,可以通过提高阅读能力来提高阅读理解培训,尤其是对学习有困难的学生。成功的阅读理解与阅读之前,之中和之后,通过培训获得的所有技能的认知和元认知策略的正确使用相关,其中包括阅读理解的元认知-句际模型。培训似乎产生了积极的影响。学生改善了阅读理解,元认知策略和一些认知技能(解码,流利度,词汇量,语言技能等)。这项研究的结果表明有必要在学校课程中包括这种培训。 ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Pribac Tina;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号