首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Gap-Graded Versus Continuously-Graded Shrinkage-Compensating Concrete
【24h】

Gap-Graded Versus Continuously-Graded Shrinkage-Compensating Concrete

机译:间隙级配与连续级配收缩补偿混凝土

获取原文

摘要

The work presents a comparative study of expansion-shrinkage characteristics of gap-graded and continuously-graded shrinkage-compensating Type-K concretes. Type-K shrinkage-compensating cement content has been adopted as the main variable parameter. The influence of this parameter on the expansion-shrinkage characteristics is studied for 50 specimens of gap-graded and continuously-graded concretes. Specimens consisted of two types: (a) with lateral reinforcement (1.16 percent), and (b) without any reinforcement. Within the range and premises of the present investigation, it was concluded that unrestrained continuously-graded shrinkage-compensating concrete requires 37.7 percent more Type-K cement, while, with lateral restraint, it requires 39.2 percent more Type-K cement, than the equivalent gap-graded shrinkage-compensating concrete having same compressive strength and workability. Thus the investigation has shown that a significant economy can be achieved for shrinkage-compensating concretes by adopting gap grading instead of the conventional continuous grading of aggregates. (Author)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号