首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Case study comparisons of vapor inhalation risk estimates: ASTM RBCA model predictions vs site-specific soil vapor data
【24h】

Case study comparisons of vapor inhalation risk estimates: ASTM RBCA model predictions vs site-specific soil vapor data

机译:蒸汽吸入风险估算的案例研究比较:asTm RBCa模型预测与特定地点的土壤蒸汽数据

获取原文

摘要

The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E-1739, Risk- Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (RBCA), offers a streamlined methodology for selecting and implementing cost-effective corrective action for petroleum hydrocarbon release sites. ASTM is also currently developing the Standard Guide for Risk Based Corrective Action which extends the RBCA process to include a wide range of chemicals of concern. Comparing the results derived from the RBCA vapor transport models with field data has underscored the extremely conservative nature of the RBCA inhalation pathway models. Two case studies are described in this paper which compare exposure point concentration and human health risk estimated from the RBCA vapor transport models and actual measurements of soil vapor concentrations and soil vapor flux.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号