首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Pollution of Ambient Air by Volatile Anesthetics: A Comparison of Four Anesthetic Management Techniques
【24h】

Pollution of Ambient Air by Volatile Anesthetics: A Comparison of Four Anesthetic Management Techniques

机译:挥发性麻醉药对环境空气的污染 - 四种麻醉管理技术的比较

获取原文

摘要

Chronic exposure to waste anesthetic gas (WAG) may lead to health problems. The purpose of this study was to compare WAG concentrations resulting from four combinations of FGF and vaporizer settings during a simulated intravenous induction where the anesthetic is deepened using a volatile anesthetic delivered via mask ventilation prior to intubation. Using lung model, WAG was sampled three times each using four different combinations and three volatile anesthetics: 3% sevoflurane, 2% isoflurane, and 6% desflurane. The combinations were FGF off/vaporizer on, FGF on/vaporizer off, leaving both on and turning both off. WAG was measured using a MIRAN Ambient Air Analyzer placed at a level approximating the anesthetist's head. One-way analysis of variance with a Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test was used to compare the concentration of WAG among the combinations of FGF/vaporizer settings and among the agents for a given combination. Regardless of the agent, only the FGF on/vaporizer on combination resulted in a statistically greater WAG level.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号