Apples and Oranges: A Comparison of Operational-Level Peace Operations Doctrine of Canada, United States, and United Kingdom.

摘要

Changes in the operating environment have resulted in a fundamental change to the shape and nature of peace operations (PO). The result is that PO have become closer in nature to intervention operations, with a focus on peace enforcement operations, rather than the traditional peacekeeping operations upon which most nations developed their PO doctrine. This has resulted in changes to PO doctrine by Canada, the US, and the UK. Given that doctrine establishes the conceptual framework for how militaries conduct operations, a common doctrine is desired to ensure interoperability between allies and coalition members. Conversely, differences in doctrine can result in differing attitudes, approaches and foci when the doctrine is operationalized for a particular mission. Thus, the intent of this paper is to determine if and where Canadian, American, and British operational level PO doctrine diverge and converge.