首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Assessment of Accelerated Tests Compared to Beachfront Test and Proposed Evaluation Method

【24h】

Assessment of Accelerated Tests Compared to Beachfront Test and Proposed Evaluation Method

机译：与海滨测试和建议的评估方法相比的加速测试评估

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Outline: Background and Test Parameters. Results of Comparison of Accelerated and Beachfront Tests. New NC Systems Testing: Panels and Galvanic Assemblies. Conclusions and Plans.

著录项

作者
Matzdorf, C;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2009
页码 1-23
总页数 23
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类工业技术 ;
关键词
Briefing charts;

机译：简报图表;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. First Comprehensive Evaluation of the M.I.C. Evaluator Device Compared to Etest and CLSI Reference Dilution Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Strains of Anaerobes and Other Fastidious Bacterial Species [J] . R. P. Rennie, L. Turnbull, C. Brosnikoff, Journal of Clinical Microbiology . 2012 ,第4期

机译：对M.I.C.的首次全面评估与Etest和CLSI参考稀释方法相比，评估器设备可对厌氧菌和其他优良细菌种类的临床菌株进行药敏试验
2. Multicenter evaluation of the reproducibility of the proposed antifungal susceptibility testing method for fermentative yeasts of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AF [J] . Cuenca Estrella M, Moore CB, Barchiesi F, Clinical microbiology and infection: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases . 2003 ,第6期

机译：欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会（AF）抗真菌药物敏感性试验小组委员会针对发酵酵母提出的抗真菌药物敏感性试验方法的可重复性的多中心评估
3. Quantitative evaluation of prion inactivation comparing steam sterilization and chemical sterilants: proposed method for test standardization. [J] . Vadrot C, Darbord JC The Journal of hospital infection . 2006 ,第2期

机译：steam消毒灭活的定量评估，比较蒸汽灭菌和化学灭菌：提议的测试标准化方法。
4. EVALUATION OF ISO NACE TESTING METHODS FOR ACCELERATED TESTING OF OFFSHORE COATINGS [C] . Darren Ward NACE International CORROSION/2006 Conference Papers . 2006

机译：加快海上涂料测试的ISO和NACE测试方法的评估
5. Assessing clinical significance of the immediate post-concussion assessment and cognitive testing battery when comparing adjusted and unadjusted RCI methods for different ranges of baseline scores [D] . Figaro, Ashley N. 2016

机译：比较不同基线分数范围的调整后和未调整后RCI方法时，评估脑震荡后评估和认知能力测试的临床意义
6. Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ System for the Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing of Gram-negative Bacteria Compared with Conventional Laboratory Testing [O] . Kerry Roulston, Rebecca Gorton, Ekaterini Kazantzaki, 2017

机译：与常规实验室检测相比用于鉴定革兰氏阴性细菌的鉴定和抗菌药物敏感性的Accelerate Pheno™系统评估
7. The bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing are usually performed manually. Recently, the number of samples has increased and the need for automatification has grown. BioMerieux has investigated Vitek2 for this purpose. HUSLAB has assigned us to compare the identification and antimicrobial results with respect to routine methods and Vitek2. Furthermore, we evaluate test reactions, ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) production and the time what it takes to get results with Vitek2. In this study, we examined a total of 183 bacterial isolates including 76 ESBL-strains, 40 nonfermenting rods, 41 fastidious bacteria and 26 fresh clinical isolates. The results of routine methods were gathered from the patient database and following this, compared to the results given by Vitek2. Vitek2 correctly identified more than 96 f the ESBL-strains and fresh clinical isolates. The results of nonfermenting rods and fastidious bacteri a were 70 oncordant with those of the routine methods. Test reaction results of Api20E were 94 nd Api20NE 70 n concordance with Vitek2 results. Approximately 80 f all Vitek2 antimicrobial results and 90 f ESBL test results were correct. Compared to earlier studies, Vitek2 performed the tests faster than the routine methods. These results suggest that Vitek2 is capable of giving rapid and accurate results. However, nonfermenting rods and fastidious bacteria should be studied further. [O] . Järveläinen Marika, Roslund Iira, Silander Maarit 2006

机译：细菌鉴定和抗菌药敏试验通常是手动进行的。最近，样品的数量增加了，并且对自动化的需求也在增长。 BioMerieux为此进行了Vitek2的研究。 HUSLAB已指派我们比较常规方法和Vitek2的鉴定和抗菌结果。此外，我们还评估了测试反应，ESBL（扩展频谱β-内酰胺酶）的产生以及使用Vitek2获得结果所需的时间。在这项研究中，我们检查了总共183个细菌分离株，包括76个ESBL菌株，40个非发酵棒，41个营养细菌和26个新鲜临床分离株。从患者数据库中收集常规方法的结果，然后将其与Vitek2给出的结果进行比较。 Vitek2正确鉴定出超过96种ESBL菌株和新鲜的临床分离株。与常规方法相比，非发酵棒和精制细菌的结果为70。 Api20E的测试反应结果与Vitek2结果一致为94nd Api20NE 70 n。所有Vitek2抗菌结果约80 f和ESBL测试结果90 f正确。与早期的研究相比，Vitek2的测试速度快于常规方法。这些结果表明Vitek2能够给出快速而准确的结果。但是，应进一步研究非发酵棒和营养细菌。

Assessment of Accelerated Tests Compared to Beachfront Test and Proposed Evaluation Method

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅