首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Comparison of Rating Techniques for JFTOT Heater Tube Deposits.
【24h】

Comparison of Rating Techniques for JFTOT Heater Tube Deposits.

机译:JFTOT加热器管道沉积等级技术比较。

获取原文

摘要

The Visual Rating method and the ALCOR Mark 8A Tube Deposit Rater, used to rate deposits that form on the Jet Fuel Thermal Oxidation Tester (JFTOT) heater tubes, were compared to each other and to measurements of the deposit thickness. An Auger Electron Spectrometer, used in conjunction with an ion gun (AES/Ion Gun), was used to measure the deposit thickness and composition. Both the Visual Rating method and the Mark 8A Tube Deposit Rater were found to correlate with deposit thickness measurements to a limited degree. The AES/Ion Gun method proved to be a useful laboratory tool for measuring the relative thickness of deposits and the elemental composition of deposits (except for hydrogen and helium). Deposits that have a spectrum of colors (i.e., peacock or rainbow type deposits) were found to be considerably thicker than Code 3 deposits. Thin film light interference was found to be the cause of the peacock associated with these deposits.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号