首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Management Information System Economic Analysis (MISEA) for Skill Qualification Test Scoring and Feedback. Executive Summary

【24h】

Management Information System Economic Analysis (MISEA) for Skill Qualification Test Scoring and Feedback. Executive Summary

机译：管理信息系统经济分析（mIsEa）技能资格测试评分和反馈。执行摘要

获取原文

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The economic analysis compares Automated Local Scoring, Manual Local Scoring, and Regional Local Scoring to the current Centralized Scoring System (baseline). The basic intent is to assist in determining the most cost effective way to provide timely and useful Feedback on SQT to individual soldiers and the chain of command/training managers. It will assist in making a decision whether or not to continue with the current scoring system, which does not meet system goals, or implement a new or modified system. (Author)

著录项

作者
Stephens, M. A.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 1981
页码 p.1-92
总页数 92
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类工业技术;
关键词
Enlisted personnel; Scoring; Qualifications; Feedback; Economic analysis; Army training; Officer personnel; Military commanders; Timeliness; Corrections; Performance(Human); Management information systems; Manpower utilization; Company level organizations; Battal;

机译：入伍人员;评分;资格;反馈;经济分析;陆军训练;军官;军事指挥官;及时性;更正;表现（人）;管理信息系统;人力资源利用;公司级组织; Battal;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching [J] . Keisuke Kazama, Masakatsu Numata, Toru Aoyama, World Journal of Surgical Oncology . 2021,第1期

机译：内窥镜外科技能资质系统是否会改善腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌后的患者的结果？多期，回顾性分析，具有倾向得分匹配
2. Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback. [J] . Xeroulis GJ, Park J, Moulton CA, Surgery . 2007,第4期

机译：向医学生教授缝合和打结技巧：一项随机对照研究，比较基于计算机的视频教学和（同时和总结）专家反馈。
3. s): All participants completed the SF-36 as a measure of HR-QOL and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the FAAM Sport version (FAAMS) as assessments of functional limitation. To compare the FAI and Ul groups, we calculated multiple analyses of variance followed by univariate tests. Additionally, we correlated the SF-36 summary component scale and domain scales with the FAAM and FAAMS scores. Results: Participants with FAI had lower scores on the SF-36 physical component summary (FA... [J] . Brent L. Arnold, Cynthia J. Wright, IVSEd, Journal of athletic training . 2011,第6期

机译：s）：所有参与者均完成了SF-36的测量，作为HR-QOL的量度，以及足踝能力测量（FAAM）和FAAM Sport版本（FAAMS），以评估功能受限。为了比较FAI和Ul组，我们计算了方差的多次分析，然后进行了单变量检验。此外，我们将SF-36摘要成分量表和领域量表与FAAM和FAAMS分数相关联。结果：FAI参与者在SF-36身体成分摘要（FA ...
4. Executive Summary - CO{sub}2 Capture-Ready Power Plants: Performance and Economic Analysis [C] . Jared Ciferno, Michael D. Rutkowski, Massood Ramezan International Technical Conference on Coal Utilization Fuel Systems . 2007

机译：执行摘要 - CO {SUB} 2捕获就绪发电厂：性能和经济分析
5. AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG DIRECT WRITING SCORES, INDIRECT LANGUAGE ARTS SCORES, AND A COMPUTER TEXT ANALYSIS PROGRAM (WRITER'S WORKBENCH, IOWA TESTS OF BASIC SKILLS). [D] . BRACE, WANDA BUCKNER. 1986

机译：直接写作得分，非直接语言艺术得分和计算机文本分析程序（作者的工作坊，基本技能的爱荷华州测试）之间的关系的调查。
6. Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients’ outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre retrospective analysis with propensity score matching [O] . Keisuke Kazama, Masakatsu Numata, Toru Aoyama, 2021

机译：内窥镜外科技能资格系统是否会改善腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌的患者的结果？多期回顾性分析具有倾向得分匹配
7. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in Collaboration With the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology31This document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in August 2001, the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in August 2001, and the European Society of Cardiology Board and Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences in August 2001.32When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology would appreciate the following citation format: Fuster V, Rydén LE, Asinger RW, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Frye RL, Halperin JL, Kay GN, Klein WW, Lévy S, McNamara RL, Prystowsky EN, Wann LS, Wyse DG. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1231–65).33This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (http://www.acc.org), the American Heart Association (http://www.americanheart.org), the European Society of Cardiology (http://www.escardio.org), and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (http://www.naspe.org). Single reprints of this document (the Executive Summary and Summary of Recommendations) is available by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. To obtain a reprint of the complete guidelines published in the mid-October issue of the European Heart Journal, call +44 207 424 4200 or +44 207 424 4389, fax +44 207 424 4433, or write Harcourt Publishers Ltd, European Heart Journal, ESC Guidelines - Reprints, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BY, United Kingdom. To purchase additional reprints, specify version and reprint number (Executive Summary 71-0208; Full-Text 71-0209): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342; or E-mail pubauth@heart.org. [O] . Fuster Valentin, Rydén Lars E, Asinger Richard W, 2001

机译：ACC / AHA / ESC治疗房颤患者的指南：执行摘要美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组和欧洲心脏病学会实践指南委员会和政策会议的报告与北美起搏和电生理学会合作制定的《房颤患者治疗管理指南》 31该文件于2001年8月获得美国心脏病学会理事会的批准，于8月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询与协调委员会的批准2001年，以及2001年8月召开的欧洲心脏病学会理事会和实践指南与政策委员会会议。32引用该文件时，美国心脏病学会，美国心脏协会和欧洲心脏病学会将赞赏以下引用格式：Fuster V，RydénLE， Asinger RW，Cannom DS，Crijns HJ，Frye RL，Halperin JL，Kay GN，Klein WW，LévyS，McNamara RL，Prystowsky EN，Wann LS，Wyse DG。 ACC / AHA / ESC治疗房颤患者的指南：执行摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组和欧洲心脏病学会实践指南委员会和政策会议的报告（委员会制定房颤患者治疗指南）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38：1231-65）.33本文档可在美国心脏病学会（http://www.acc.org），美国心脏协会（http://www.acc.org）的万维网站点上找到。 www.americanheart.org），欧洲心脏病学会（http://www.escardio.org）和北美起搏和电生理学会（http://www.naspe.org）。可致电800-253-4636（仅适用于美国）或写信给美国心脏病，教育服务学院，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，获得本文档的单版（执行摘要和建议摘要）。要获得《欧洲心脏杂志》十月中发行的完整指南的重印本，请致电+44 207 424 4200或+44 207 424 4389，传真+44 207 424 4433，或写信给《欧洲心脏杂志》 Harcourt Publishers Ltd ，ESC指南-转载，英国伦敦詹姆斯敦路32号，NW1 7BY。要购买其他重印本，请指定版本和重印编号（执行摘要71-0208；全文71-0209）：最多999份，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671；或1000或更多副本，请致电214-706-1466，传真214-691-6342;或发送电子邮件至pubauth@heart.org。

Management Information System Economic Analysis (MISEA) for Skill Qualification Test Scoring and Feedback. Executive Summary

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅