...
首页> 外文期刊>Physica, D. Nonlinear phenomena >Comparison between advected-field and level-set methods in the study of vesicle dynamics
【24h】

Comparison between advected-field and level-set methods in the study of vesicle dynamics

机译:平流场和水平集方法在囊泡动力学研究中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Phospholipidic membranes and vesicles constitute a basic element in real biological functions. Vesicles are viewed as a model system to mimic basic viscoelastic behaviors of some cells, like red blood cells. Phase field and level-set models are powerful tools to tackle dynamics of membranes and their coupling to the flow. These two methods are somewhat similar, but to date no bridge between them has been made. This is a first focus of this paper, where we show how the phase-field methods developed in Biben and Misbah (2003) [7], Beaucourt (2004) [9], Biben (2005) [33] for immersed vesicles could be considered as a level-set method for a particular strain-stress relationship. The main conclusion is that the two methods share several common features and we shall provide the correspondence between the two methods. Furthermore, a constitutive viscoelastic law is derived for the composite fluid: the ambient fluid and the membranes. We present two different approaches to deal with the membrane local incompressibility, and point out differences. Some numerical results following from the level-set approach are presented.
机译:磷脂膜和囊泡构成实际生物学功能中的基本元素。囊泡被视为模拟某些细胞(如红细胞)的基本粘弹性行为的模型系统。相场和水平集模型是解决膜动力学及其与流耦合的强大工具。这两种方法有些相似,但是到目前为止,它们之间尚未建立桥梁。这是本文的第一个重点,我们将展示在Biben和Misbah(2003)[7],Beaucourt(2004)[9],Biben(2005)[33]中开发的相场方法如何可以用于浸没囊泡。被认为是特定应变-应力关系的水平设定方法。主要结论是这两种方法具有几个共同的特征,我们将提供这两种方法之间的对应关系。此外,还为复合流体(环境流体和膜)导出了本构粘弹性定律。我们提出了两种不同的方法来处理膜的局部不可压缩性,并指出了差异。提出了一些基于水平集方法的数值结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号