...
首页> 外文期刊>Photomedicine and laser surgery >Radiant power determination of low-level laser therapy equipment and characterization of its clinical use procedures.
【24h】

Radiant power determination of low-level laser therapy equipment and characterization of its clinical use procedures.

机译:低水平激光治疗设备的辐射功率测定及其临床使用程序的表征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of this study were to characterize low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and the physical therapy clinical procedures for its use. BACKGROUND DATA: There are few scientific studies that characterize the calibration of LLLT equipment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty lasers at 36 physical therapy clinics were selected. The equipment was characterized through data collected from the owner manuals, direct consultation with the manufacturers, and a questionnaire answered by the users. A digital potency analyzer was used to calibrate released mean potency. Qualitative data were presented throughout the descriptive statistics and quantitative data were analyzed by the Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher tests (significance, p < 0.05). RESULTS: The laser equipment was either AsGa (70.5%) or HeNe (23.5%), and 60% was analog and acquired over 5 years ago. The majority of the equipment was used 10-15 times per week and the most frequent density level used was 2 to 4 J/cm(2). Protective goggles were available in only 19.4% of the clinics evaluated. The association between the analyzed categories demonstrated that a lower mean potency was correlated both with equipment acquired over 5 years ago and analog technology. The determined mean potency was lower than the one claimed by the manufacturer (p < 0.05). In 30 cases, the analyzed equipment presented a potency between 3 microW and 5.6 mW; in three cases, the potency was >25 mW; and in seven cases, potency was nonexistent. CONCLUSION: The analyzed equipment was out-dated and periodical maintenance was not conducted, which was reflected in the low irradiated potency.
机译:目的:本研究的主要目的是表征低水平激光疗法(LLLT)及其使用的物理疗法临床程序。背景数据:很少有科学研究能够表征LLLT设备的校准。材料与方法:在36家物理治疗诊所中选择了40台激光器。通过从用户手册中收集数据,与制造商直接协商以及用户回答的调查表来表征设备。使用数字效能分析仪来校准释放的平均效能。在整个描述性统计数据中均给出了定性数据,并通过Wilcoxon / Kruskal-Wallis和Fisher检验分析了定量数据(显着性,p <0.05)。结果:激光设备是5年前购买的AsGa(70.5%)或HeNe(23.5%),而60%是模拟设备。大部分设备每周使用10-15次,最常用的密度级别是2至4 J / cm(2)。所评估的诊所中只有19.4%提供了防护镜。分析类别之间的关联表明,较低的平均效能与5年前购买的设备和模拟技术相关。所确定的平均效价低于制造商要求的平均效价(p <0.05)。在30个案例中,分析过的设备的效能介于3微瓦和5.6毫瓦之间;在三种情况下,效价> 25 mW;在七种情况下,没有效力。结论:被分析的设备已经过时,没有进行定期维护,这反映在较低的辐照效能上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号