...
首页> 外文期刊>Photomedicine and laser surgery >The influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning versus self-etching adhesives with acid etching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
【24h】

The influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning versus self-etching adhesives with acid etching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

机译:Er:YAG激光调理与采用酸蚀刻的自蚀刻粘合剂对正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets after acid etching, laser ablation, self-etching primer application, and combined treatments. METHODS: One hundred defect-free premolars were randomly assigned to five groups. The teeth received the following treatments: group 1: phosphoric acid + Transbond XT primer; group 2: Transbond Plus Self-Etching Primer (TPSEP); group 3: Er:YAG laser ablation + Transbond XT primer; group 4: Er:YAG laser ablation + phosphoric acid + Transbond XT primer; and group 5: Er:YAG laser ablation + TPSEP. Transbond XT Adhesive Paste was used in all groups for bracket bonding. Samples were stored in deionized water at 37 degrees C for 24 h. The shear debonding test was performed at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. Failed brackets were examined by a stereomicroscope at 16 x magnification to determine the bond failure interface using a modified adhesive remnant index (ARI). SBS values were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for ARI scores and pairwise comparisons were done using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Mean SBS values (MPa) and standard deviations for the groups were: group 1, 13.18 +/- 3.45; group 2, 13.52 +/- 4.38; group 3, 10.33 +/- 4.74; group 4, 13.00 +/- 3.47; and group 5, 12.46 +/- 6.31. No significant differences were observed in the SBS of all the groups evaluated, but there was a significant difference in ARI scores, with group 3 showing higher ARI scores than groups 1 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Er:YAG laser ablation and self-etching primer application showed similar SBS values as conventional acidetching for bonding brackets.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较在酸蚀,激光烧蚀,自蚀底漆涂覆和联合处理后的正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。方法:将一百个无缺陷的前磨牙随机分为五组。牙齿接受以下治疗:第1组:磷酸+ Transbond XT底漆;第2组:Transbond Plus自蚀刻底漆(TPSEP);第3组:Er:YAG激光烧蚀+ Transbond XT底漆;第4组:Er:YAG激光烧蚀+磷酸+ Transbond XT底漆;第5组:Er:YAG激光消融+ TPSEP。所有组都使用Transbond XT胶粘剂进行托槽粘接。将样品在37摄氏度的去离子水中保存24小时。剪切剥离试验以5mm / min的十字头速度进行。通过立体显微镜在16倍放大下检查失败的托槽,以使用改良的粘合剂残留指数(ARI)确定粘结失败的界面。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)比较SBS值。 Kruskal-Wallis检验用于ARI评分,成对比较使用Mann-Whitney U检验和Bonferroni校正进行。结果:各组的平均SBS值(MPa)和标准偏差为:第1组,13.18 +/- 3.45;第2组,13.52 +/- 4.38;第3组,10.33 +/- 4.74;第4组,13.00 +/- 3.47;和第5组,12.46 +/- 6.31。在所有评估组中,SBS均未观察到显着差异,但ARI得分存在显着差异,第3组的ARI得分高于第1组和第4组。结论:Er:YAG激光消融和自蚀刻底漆的应用所示的SBS值与传统的用于托槽的酸蚀相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号