首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy, psychiatry, & psychology: PPP >Personality Disorders: Moral or Medical Kinds-Or Both?
【24h】

Personality Disorders: Moral or Medical Kinds-Or Both?

机译:人格障碍:道德或医学类型-或两者兼而有之?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article critically examines Louis Char-land's claim that personality disorders are moral rather than medical kinds by exploring the relationship between personality disorders and virtue ethics. We propose that the conceptual resources of virtue theory can inform psychiatry's thinking about personality disorders, but also that virtue theory as understood by Aristotle cannot be reduced to the narrow domain of 'the moral' in the modern sense of the term. Some overlap between the moral domain's notion of character-based ethics and the medical domain's notion of character-based disorders is unavoidable. We also apply a modified version of John Sadler's "moral wrongfulness test" to borderline and narcissistic personality disorders. With respect to both diagnoses, we argue that they involve negative moral evaluations, but may also have indispensable nonmoral features and, therefore, classify legitimate psychiatric disorders.
机译:本文通过探讨人格障碍与美德伦理之间的关系,对路易·夏兰的观点进行了批判性的考察,他认为人格障碍是道德而不是医学。我们认为,美德理论的概念资源可以为精神病学关于人格障碍的思考提供参考,而且亚里士多德所理解的美德理论不能用现代的术语简化为“道德”的狭窄领域。道德领域的基于品格伦理的观念与医学领域的基于品格障碍的观念之间不可避免地存在某些重叠。我们还对约翰·萨德勒(John Sadler)的“道德不道德测试”进行了修正,以适用于边缘性和自恋型人格障碍。关于这两种诊断,我们认为它们涉及负面的道德评估,但也可能具有必不可少的非道德特征,因此将合法的精神疾病分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号