首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy, psychiatry, & psychology: PPP >Are the Deluded Believers? Are Philosophers Among the Deluded*
【24h】

Are the Deluded Believers? Are Philosophers Among the Deluded*

机译:是迷信的人吗?被迷惑的哲学家*

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Are delusions best understood as a species of belief? Can I be deluded that p without believing that p? Because delusion is a clinical symptom, there are conflicting data at every turn. Perhaps it is best to think of delusions as beliefs not because they necessarily are beliefs, but because doing so helps patients. If one thinks that "denying that delusions are beliefs" means denying deluded patients "a voice in their own treatment" and that this would cut them off from alternative and healthier ways of thinking of themselves or the world, then one may wish to classify delusions as beliefs (see Kinderman and Bentall 2007, 288).
机译:妄想最好理解为一种信仰吗?我可以在不相信p的情况下迷惑p吗?因为妄想是一种临床症状,所以动不动就有矛盾的数据。也许最好将妄想视为信念,不是因为它们一定是信念,而是因为这样做会帮助患者。如果有人认为“否认妄想是信念”意味着拒绝欺骗患者“在他们自己的治疗中发出声音”,而这会使他们脱离对自己或世界的另一种更健康的思考方式,那么人们可能希望对妄想进行分类作为信仰(参见Kinderman and Bentall 2007,288)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号