首页> 外文期刊>Phlebology >Letter Re: Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Letter Re: Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial

机译:字母Re:高位结扎静脉曲张与高位结扎和剥离相比静脉内激光消融术与高位结扎术:多中心随机对照试验的初步结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dear Dr Flessenkamper: Congratulations on this large multicentre randomized trial; Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. The numbers are impressive, but the patient total falls fewer than the calculated statistical minimum required (469). Although the plan was for equal randomization between the three treatment groups, there were in fact more patients in the high ligation/stripping (HL/ST) group and least in the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) group.
机译:亲爱的Flessenkamper博士:祝贺这项大型的多中心随机试验;与大结扎静脉曲张相比,高结扎术和高结扎术相比静脉内激光消融术有无高结扎术:一项多中心随机对照试验的初步结果。这些数字令人印象深刻,但患者总数下降的次数少于计算出的所需统计最小值(469)。尽管计划在三个治疗组之间进行随机分组,但实际上,高结扎/剥离(HL / ST)组的患者更多,而静脉激光消融(EVLA)组的患者最少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号