首页> 外文期刊>Physics in medicine and biology. >Dosimetric accuracy assessment of a treatment plan verification system for scanned proton beam radiotherapy: One-year experimental results and Monte Carlo analysis of the involved uncertainties
【24h】

Dosimetric accuracy assessment of a treatment plan verification system for scanned proton beam radiotherapy: One-year experimental results and Monte Carlo analysis of the involved uncertainties

机译:扫描质子束放射治疗治疗计划验证系统的剂量学准确性评估:一年的实验结果和有关不确定性的蒙特卡洛分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

During one year of clinical activity at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadron Therapy 31 patients were treated with actively scanned proton beams. Results of patient-specific quality assurance procedures are presented here which assess the accuracy of a three-dimensional dose verification technique with the simultaneous use of multiple small-volume ionization chambers. To investigate critical cases of major deviations between treatment planning system (TPS) calculated and measured data points, a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation tool was implemented for plan verification in water. Starting from MC results, the impact of dose calculation, dose delivery and measurement set-up uncertainties on plan verification results was analyzed. All resulting patient-specific quality checks were within the acceptance threshold, which was set at 5% for both mean deviation between measured and calculated doses and standard deviation. The mean deviation between TPS dose calculation and measurement was less than ±3% in 86% of the cases. When all three sources of uncertainty were accounted for, simulated data sets showed a high level of agreement, with mean and maximum absolute deviation lower than 2.5% and 5%, respectively.
机译:在意大利国家肿瘤强子治疗中心进行的临床活动中,有31名患者接受了主动扫描质子束治疗。这里介绍了针对特定患者的质量保证程序的结果,该结果通过同时使用多个小体积电离室来评估三维剂量验证技术的准确性。为了调查处理计划系统(TPS)的计算值和测量数据点之间存在重大偏差的严重情况,我们采用了蒙特卡洛(MC)模拟工具对水中的计划进行验证。从MC结果开始,分析了剂量计算,剂量输送和测量设置不确定性对计划验证结果的影响。所有由此产生的针对患者的质量检查均在接受阈值之内,对于测量和计算的剂量之间的平均偏差和标准偏差,该阈值均设置为5%。在86%的病例中,TPS剂量计算与测量之间的平均偏差小于±3%。当考虑了所有三个不确定性来源时,模拟数据集显示出很高的一致性,均值和最大绝对偏差分别低于2.5%和5%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号