首页> 外文期刊>Philosophy of Science >Information and Veridicality: Information Processing and the Bar-Hillel/Carnap Paradox
【24h】

Information and Veridicality: Information Processing and the Bar-Hillel/Carnap Paradox

机译:信息与真实性:信息处理与Bar-Hillel / Carnap悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Floridi's Theory of Strongly Semantic Information posits the Veridicality Thesis (i.e., information is true). One motivation is that it can serve as a foundation for information-based epistemology being an alternative to the tripartite theory of knowledge. However, the Veridicality thesis is false, if 'information' is to play an explanatory role in human cognition. Another motivation is avoiding the so-called Bar-Hillel/Carnap paradox (i.e., any contradiction is maximally informative). But this paradox only seems paradoxical, if (a) 'information' and 'informativeness' are synonymous, (b) logic is a theory of inference, or (c) validity suffices for rational inference; a, b, and c are false.
机译:弗洛里迪(Floridi)的强语义信息理论提出了真实性论点(即信息是真实的)。一种动机是它可以作为基于信息的认识论的基础,它是对三方知识理论的替代。但是,如果“信息”在人类认知中发挥解释性作用,那么“ Verityicality”论题是错误的。另一个动机是避免所谓的Bar-Hillel / Carnap悖论(即,任何矛盾都能最大程度地提供信息)。但是,如果(a)“信息”和“信息性”是同义词,(b)逻辑是一种推理理论,或者(c)足以进行理性推理的有效性,则该悖论仅显得自相矛盾。 a,b和c为假。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号