【24h】

Disturbance and change in biodiversity

机译:生物多样性的干扰和变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Understanding how disturbance affects biodiversity is important for both fundamental and applied reasons. Here, I investigate how disturbances with different ecological effects change biodiversity metrics. I define three main types of disturbance effects: D disturbance (shifts in mortality rate), B disturbance (shifts in reproductive rates) and K disturbance (shifts in carry-ing capacity). Numerous composite disturbances can be defined including any combination of these three types of ecological effects. The consequences of D, B and K disturbances, as well as of composite DBK disturbances are examined by comparing metrics before and after a dis-turbance, in disturbed and undisturbed communities. I use simulations of neutral communities and examine species richness, total abundance and species abundance distributions. The pat-terns of change in biodiversity metrics are consistent among different types of disturbance. K disturbance has the most severe effects, followed by D disturbance, and B disturbance has nearly negligible effects. Consequences of composite DBK disturbances are more complex than any of the three types of disturbance, with unimodal relationships along a disturbance gradient arising when D, B and K are negatively correlated. Importantly, regardless of disturb-ance type, community isolation enhances the negative consequences and hinders the positive effects of disturbances.
机译:出于根本和实际原因,了解干扰如何影响生物多样性很重要。在这里,我研究了具有不同生态影响的干扰如何改变生物多样性指标。我定义了三种主要的干扰效应:D干扰(死亡率的变化),B干扰(生殖率的变化)和K干扰(携带能力的变化)。可以定义多种复合干扰,包括这三种类型的生态效应的任意组合。通过比较扰动前后不受干扰的社区中扰动前后的指标,可以检验D,B和K扰动以及复合DBK扰动的后果。我使用中性社区的模拟并检查物种丰富度,总丰度和物种丰度分布。不同干扰类型之间生物多样性指标变化的模式是一致的。 K干扰的影响最严重,其次是D干扰,而B干扰的影响几乎可以忽略不计。复合DBK干扰的后果比三种类型的干扰中的任何一种都更为复杂,当D,B和K呈负相关时,沿着干扰梯度的单峰关系就会出现。重要的是,无论干扰类型如何,社区隔离都会增加负面影响并阻碍干扰的积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号