首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Psychological Science >Is Utilitarianism Risky? How the Same Antecedents and Mechanism Produce Both Utilitarian and Risky Choices
【24h】

Is Utilitarianism Risky? How the Same Antecedents and Mechanism Produce Both Utilitarian and Risky Choices

机译:功利主义有风险吗?同一条件和机制如何产生功利性和风险性选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Philosophers and psychologists have long been interested in identifying factors that influence moral judgment. In the current analysis, we compare the literatures on moral psychology and decision making under uncertainty to propose that utilitarian choices are driven by the same forces that lead to risky choices. Spanning from neurocognitive to hormonal to interpersonal levels of analysis, we identify six antecedents that increase both utilitarian and risky choices (ventromedial prefrontal cortex brain lesions, psychopathology, testosterone, incidental positive affect, power, and social connection) and one antecedent that reduces these choices (serotonin activity). We identify the regulation of negative affect as a common mechanism through which the effects of each antecedent on utilitarian and risky choices are explained. By demonstrating that the same forces and the same underlying mechanism that produce risky choices also promote utilitarian choices, we offer a deeper understanding of how basic psychological systems underlie moral judgment.
机译:哲学家和心理学家长期以来一直对确定影响道德判断的因素感兴趣。在当前的分析中,我们比较了不确定性条件下道德心理学和决策制定的文献,提出功利主义选择是由导致风险选择的相同力量驱动的。从神经认知到激素再到人际关系的分析,我们确定了六个增加功利性和风险性选择的前因(前额叶皮质前脑皮质病变,心理病理学,睾丸激素,偶然的积极影响,力量和社会联系)和一个减少这些选择的前因(血清素活性)。我们将消极影响的调节确定为一种常见的机制,通过该机制可以解释对功利性和风险性选择的每个前提条件的影响。通过证明产生风险选择的相同的力量和相同的潜在机制也促进了功利主义的选择,我们提供了对基本心理系统如何构成道德判断的更深刻的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号