...
首页> 外文期刊>Perfusion >A clinical evaluation of platelet function, haemolysis and oxygen transfer during cardiopulmonary bypass comparing the Quantum HF-6700 to the HF-5700 hollow fibre membrane oxygenator.
【24h】

A clinical evaluation of platelet function, haemolysis and oxygen transfer during cardiopulmonary bypass comparing the Quantum HF-6700 to the HF-5700 hollow fibre membrane oxygenator.

机译:将Quantum HF-6700与HF-5700中空纤维膜充氧器进行比较,对体外循环过程中血小板功能,溶血和氧转移的临床评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The continued improvement of oxygenators is an important aspect of patient safety during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The purpose of this study was to compare the Bard William Harvey HF-5700 oxygenator to the upgraded Bard Quantum HF-6700, which has recently been introduced into clinical practice. No clinical evaluation of this device has been published to date. The two oxygenators differ principally in that the Quantum has a smaller priming volume, achieved at the expense of a smaller membrane surface area which could result in sub-optimal gas exchange characteristics, increased haemolysis and increased platelet dysfunction during CPB. Twenty adult patients undergoing elective, first time coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were randomly assigned either to the HF-5700 (n=10) or to the HF-6700 (n=10) group. One patient underwent mitral valve repair in addition to CABG and was excluded from further study. There were no statistically significant differences in either preoperative or operative parameters between the two groups. Samples were obtained at the start of CPB, at 30 min, 60 min, at the end of CPB and at 1 h following termination of CPB. No significant differences between the two groups were found in oxygen transfer, haemolysis (plasma haptoglobin levels) or platelet function (a novel platelet activating factor (PAF)-induced platelet activation test) at any of the time points during CPB. It was concluded that the Quantum HF-6700 matches the HF-5700 for the parameters studied, whilst having the advantage of requiring a smaller priming volume.
机译:充氧器的持续改进是体外循环(CPB)期间患者安全的重要方面。这项研究的目的是将Bard William Harvey HF-5700充氧器与升级版的Bard Quantum HF-6700充氧器进行比较,该产品最近已被引入临床实践。迄今为止尚未对该装置进行临床评估。两种氧合器的主要区别在于,Quantum具有较小的启动体积,但以较小的膜表面积为代价,这可能导致CPB期间气体交换特性欠佳,溶血增加和血小板功能障碍增加。 20名接受择期第一次冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的成年患者被随机分配到HF-5700(n = 10)或HF-6700(n = 10)组。除CABG外,一名患者还接受了二尖瓣修复,因此被排除在进一步研究之外。两组之间的术前或手术参数无统计学差异。在CPB开始时,30分钟,60分钟时,CPB结束时以及CPB终止后1小时时获得样品。在CPB期间的任何时间点,两组之间的氧气转移,溶血(血浆触珠蛋白水平)或血小板功能(一种新的血小板活化因子(PAF)诱导的血小板活化试验)均无显着差异。结论是,Quantum HF-6700在所研究的参数上与HF-5700相匹配,同时具有需要较小灌注体积的优点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号