首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric emergency care >Comparative performance of glidescope video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope in children with immobilized cervical spine
【24h】

Comparative performance of glidescope video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope in children with immobilized cervical spine

机译:滑行镜视频喉镜和Macintosh喉镜在固定型颈椎儿童中的比较性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a crossover randomized clinical study comparing performance of the Glide-Scope video laryngoscope (GVL) and Macintosh laryngoscope in children with immobilized cervical spine, Vlatten et al1 showed that using the GVL resulted in a significantly declined glottic view. In our view, however, there are several aspects of this study that need to be clarified. First, the authors did not describe the types of the GVL used in this study. As yet, there are totally 3 types of GVL available: the conventional GVL, the Cobalt GVL and the Ranger GVL. Also, every device has 2 to 3 reusable or disposable blades available for pediatric patients. The shapes, lengths, and angulations of the blades vary among the 3 GVL devices and between the reusable and disposable GVL blades (http://verathon.com/language/en-us/ products/glidescope.aspx).
机译:在一项交叉随机临床研究中,比较了Glide-Scope视频喉镜(GVL)和Macintosh喉镜在固定颈椎儿童中的表现,Vlatten等[1]显示,使用GVL会导致声门视图明显下降。但是,我们认为,该研究的几个方面需要澄清。首先,作者没有描述本研究中使用的GVL类型。到目前为止,共有3种类型的GVL:常规GVL,钴GVL和Ranger GVL。而且,每个设备都有2到3个可重复使用或一次性的刀片供儿科患者使用。刀片的形状,长度和角度在3个GVL装置之间以及可重复使用和一次性GVL刀片之间(http://verathon.com/language/zh-cn/products/glidescope.aspx)不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号