首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine >Oswald T. Avery: nobel laureate or noble luminary?
【24h】

Oswald T. Avery: nobel laureate or noble luminary?

机译:Oswald T. Avery:诺贝尔奖获得者还是高贵的名人?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 1944, Oswald T. Avery and his associates reported that DNA was the chemical substance acting to genetically transform species of pneumococcal bacteria. Many believe that Avery warranted the Nobel Prize for this discovery. Avery's work is evaluated here in light of the Nobel archives, which have made public the names of those who nominated Avery for this award and the basis for each of the nominations. Based on the archival record, it seems that key biological chemists were not convinced by Avery's claim that DNA was the basis of heredity, that no geneticists nominated Avery, and that most nominators overlooked Avery's work on DNA in favor of his work on the immunogenicity of the bacterial capsule. Three critical scientific factors that adversely affected acceptance of Avery's work were the possibility of protein contamination of DNA, the role of DNA transformation limited to a few species of bacteria, and the possibility that DNA was acting as a chemical mutagen on the true genetic substance. In addition, Avery's own idiosyncratic behavior may have unintentionally confounded acceptance of his groundbreaking discovery.
机译:1944年,奥斯瓦尔德·T·艾弗里(Oswald T. Avery)及其同事报告说,DNA是一种化学物质,可通过遗传途径转化肺炎球菌细菌。许多人认为,艾利(Avery)因这项发现而获得了诺贝尔奖。此处根据诺贝尔档案馆对艾利的工作进行评估,该档案公开了提名艾利获得该奖项的人的姓名以及每项提名的依据。根据档案记录,似乎主要生物化学家们并不相信艾弗里(Avery)认为DNA是遗传的基础,没有遗传学家提名艾弗里(Avery),而且大多数提名者都忽略了艾弗里(Avery)在DNA方面的工作,而支持他在DNA免疫原性方面的工作。细菌胶囊。对Avery的研究产生不利影响的三个关键科学因素是:蛋白质污染DNA的可能性,DNA转化的作用仅限于少数细菌,以及DNA充当真正遗传物质的化学诱变剂的可能性。此外,埃弗里(Avery)自己的特质行为可能会无意间混淆了他的开创性发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号