首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >Endotracheal suctioning of the neonate: comparison of two methods as a source of mucus material for research.
【24h】

Endotracheal suctioning of the neonate: comparison of two methods as a source of mucus material for research.

机译:新生儿气管内吸引:比较两种方法作为黏液材料研究的来源。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Endotracheal suctioning in the neonatal intensive care setting is a routine procedure performed to maintain patency of the airway in ventilated infants. Harvested material can also be a source of mucus for research into neonatal respiratory disorders. We aimed to investigate whether the composition of material obtained by our clinically preferred technique of dry shallow suctioning differed significantly from that obtained with saline lavage and deep suctioning. Eleven pairs of dry and saline lavage aspiration samples were compared for neutrophil enzyme myeloperoxidase, total and active alpha(1)-antitrypsin, alpha(1)-antitrypsin complexed with elastase, and secretory leukoprotease inhibitor. Even though individual values of each analyte, expressed per gram of albumin, varied over at least a fivefold range, there was no difference between mean values of dry and lavage samples for any of the constituents. We conclude that the yield of material for research obtained by dry shallow suctioning is adequate and the quality at least as satisfactory as that provided by saline lavage.
机译:新生儿重症监护室中的气管内抽吸是维持通气婴儿通气道通畅的常规程序。收获的材料也可能是研究新生儿呼吸系统疾病的粘液来源。我们旨在研究通过我们的临床上优选的干浅吸法获得的材料的成分与用盐水灌洗和深吸法获得的材料的组成是否显着不同。比较了11对干和盐水灌洗抽吸样品的中性粒细胞酶髓过氧化物酶,总和活性α(1)-抗胰蛋白酶,与弹性蛋白酶复合的α(1)-抗胰蛋白酶和分泌性白蛋白蛋白酶抑制剂。即使每克白蛋白表示的每种分析物的单个值在至少五倍的范围内变化,但对于任何成分,干样品和灌洗样品的平均值之间没有差异。我们得出的结论是,通过干浅吸吮获得的用于研究的材料的产量是足够的,其质量至少与盐水灌洗提供的质量一样令人满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号