...
首页> 外文期刊>Peanut Science >Peanut Yield, Market Grade, and Economics with Two Surface Drip Lateral Spacings
【24h】

Peanut Yield, Market Grade, and Economics with Two Surface Drip Lateral Spacings

机译:具有两个表面滴灌横向间距的花生产量,市场等级和经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Surface drip irrigation laterals were spaced next to crop rows and in alternate row middles to document crop yield, market grade and gross/partial economic returns compared with non-irrigated practices. A surface drip irrigation system was installed at two sites on a Faceville (Site 1) fine sandy loam and a Greenville (Site 2) fine sandy loam with 3 and 1% slope, respectively. The cultivar Georgia Green (GG) was planted in both single and twin-row configuration while the cultivar ViruGard (VG) was planted in only a twin-row configuration. Pod yield, farmer stock grade, and partial economic returns were determined for three growing seasons (2002 to 2004). Surface drip irrigated peanut had greater yield, market grade, and gross revenue compared with non-irrigated regimes. Subtracting the cost of the drip tubing showed that laterals spaced at 0.91 m are not cost effective ($-132/ha) while those spaced at 1.83 m returned an average $120/ha compared with the non-irrigated treatment. The cultivar GG had 425 kg/ha higher pod yield compared with VG (4035 kg/ha). Within irrigated lateral treatments, peanut planted in twin-row orientation had 1% higher market grade and lower OK compared with single row orientations. Pod yield and market grade was more stable at Site 2 compared with Site 1 which was probably due to slope and aspect characteristics associated with each site and not necessarily with soil series. The use of surface drip irrigation with peanut can be economically feasible if pod yield increases by at least 675 kg/ha and growers place drip tubing in alternate row middles.
机译:与非灌溉方式相比,地面滴灌支管在作物行旁和中间交替排开,以记录作物产量,市场等级和总/部分经济回报。在Faceville(站点1)细砂壤土和Greenville(站点2)细砂壤土的坡度分别为3%和1%的两个位置上安装了地面滴灌系统。品种乔治亚绿(GG)以单行和双行两种方式种植,而品种维鲁加德(VG)仅以双行的形式种植。确定了三个生长季节(2002年至2004年)的豆荚产量,农户存货等级和部分经济回报。与非灌溉方式相比,地面滴灌花生具有更高的产量,市场等级和总收入。减去滴水管的成本,相距0.91 m的支管成本效益不高(-132美元/公顷),而相距1.83 m的支管与非灌溉处理相比平均回报为120美元/公顷。与VG(4035 kg / ha)相比,GG的荚果产量高出425 kg / ha。在灌溉的横向处理中,与单行种植相比,以双行种植方式种植的花生具有较高的市场档次和较低的合格率。与地点1相比,地点2的豆荚产量和市场等级更为稳定,这可能是由于每个地点的坡度和坡度特征,而不一定与土壤系列有关。如果荚果产量至少增加675公斤/公顷,且种植者将滴灌管放在交替的中间排中,则在花生上使用地面滴灌在经济上是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号