...
首页> 外文期刊>Particulate Science and Technology: An International Journal >Comparison of Subsieving Techniques Based on the Relation of Particle Size and Specific Surface Area in Mineral Processing
【24h】

Comparison of Subsieving Techniques Based on the Relation of Particle Size and Specific Surface Area in Mineral Processing

机译:基于粒度与比表面积关系的选矿工艺比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This investigation is concerned with the comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of subsieving techniques widely used in mineral processing throughout the world. With this purpose, the subsieving techniques of Andreasen pipette, Coulter counter, and laser diffraction methods were compared each other by determining the relationship between specific surface area and particle size distribution. In the tests, the two different standard quartz sand samples (A and B) from the Official Material Testing Institute for Nonmetallic Minerals, Clausthal-Zellerfeld with a particle density of ρ = 2.65 g/cm~3 were used. As a result, the Coulter counter method had the most favorable results in terms of calculated specific surface areas of 3848 cm~2/g for sample A and 2852cm~2/g for sample B, with standard deviations 41.29 and 32.48, respectively.
机译:这项研究关注的是世界范围内广泛用于矿物加工的沉降技术的优缺点的比较。为此,通过确定比表面积和粒度分布之间的关系,将安德森森移液管的沉降技术,库尔特计数仪和激光衍射方法进行了比较。在测试中,使用了来自非金属矿物官方材料测试研究所Clausthal-Zellerfeld的两种不同的标准石英砂样品(A和B),其颗粒密度为ρ= 2.65 g / cm〜3。结果,就计算出的样品A的比表面积为3848 cm〜2 / g和样品B的2852cm〜2 / g而言,Coulter计数法的结果最为有利,标准差分别为41.29和32.48。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号