首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Evaluation of quality-of-life measures for use in palliative care: a systematic review.
【24h】

Evaluation of quality-of-life measures for use in palliative care: a systematic review.

机译:评价用于姑息治疗的生活质量措施:系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: In this literature review we evaluated the feasibility and clinimetric quality of quality-of-life (QoL) measurement instruments suitable for use in palliative care. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review to identify instruments measuring (at least one domain of) QoL. We selected articles that present data on patients receiving palliative care and at least one measurement property. A checklist was used to describe the characteristics of the instruments, and a widely accepted rating list was used to evaluate the clinimetric aspects. RESULTS: 29 instruments were identified and evaluated, most of which were targeted at palliative patients in general. None of the instruments demonstrated satisfactory results for all measurement properties. Fourteen instruments received positive ratings for construct validity. Thirteen instruments were tested for reliability, but only two were tested adequately and had positive results (ICC>0.70). Responsiveness was not tested adequately for any of the instruments. Very few of the studies provided information on the interpretation of the scores. Overall, the MQOL, followed by the QUAL-E and the QODD, received the best ratings for their measurement properties. CONCLUSIONS: Many measurement instruments were identified, but most had not yet been adequately evaluated. The evaluation of existing instruments with good content validity should have priority over the development of new instruments.
机译:目的:在这篇文献综述中,我们评估了适用于姑息治疗的生活质量(QoL)测量仪器的可行性和临床质量。方法:我们进行了系统的文献综述,以鉴定测量QoL(至少一个领域)的仪器。我们选择了能提供有关接受姑息治疗和至少一种测量特性的患者的数据的文章。清单用于描述仪器的特性,广泛使用的评级清单用于评估斜度方面。结果:鉴定并评估了29种仪器,其中大多数针对姑息性患者。对于所有测量特性,没有仪器显示出令人满意的结果。十四种工具的结构效度获得了肯定的评价。测试了13台仪器的可靠性,但只有两台仪器经过了充分测试,并获得了积极的结果(ICC> 0.70)。对于任何一种工具,响应性均未得到充分测试。很少有研究提供有关分数解释的信息。总体而言,MQOL,QUAL-E和QODD紧随其后,获得了最佳的测量性能评级。结论:确定了许多测量仪器,但大多数尚未得到充分评估。对现有具有良好内容有效性的工具的评估应优先于新工具的开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号