...
首页> 外文期刊>Palliative medicine >Validation of the confusion assessment method in the palliative care setting.
【24h】

Validation of the confusion assessment method in the palliative care setting.

机译:姑息治疗环境中混淆评估方法的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is widely used in the palliative care setting despite the fact that its performance in this population has not been validated. The aim of the study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the CAM when used by Non-Consultant Hospital Doctors (NCHDs) working in a specialist palliative care unit. A pilot phase was performed in which NCHDs received a 1-hour training session based on the original CAM training manual. 32 patients underwent 33 assessments in the pilot phase but the sensitivity of the CAM was only 0.5 (0.22-0.78) and specificity was 1.0 (0.81-1.0). An 'enhanced' training programme was devised that took place over two 1-hour sessions and involved case-based learning focused on the areas where the NCHDs were experiencing difficulty. 52 patients underwent 54 assessments in the main phase of the study and the performance of the CAM improved significantly. Sensitivity was 0.88 (0.62-0.98) and specificity was 1.0 (0.88-1.0). The results suggest that the CAM is a valid screening tool for delirium in the palliative care setting but its performance is dependent on the skill of the operator. NCHDs require a certain standard of training before becoming proficient in its use.
机译:尽管尚未验证其在该人群中的表现,但在姑息治疗环境中仍广泛使用了混淆评估方法(CAM)。这项研究的目的是确定在专科姑息治疗部门工作的非咨询医院医生(NCHD)使用CAM时的敏感性和特异性。进行了试点阶段,其中NCHD根据原始的CAM培训手册接受了1小时的培训。 32位患者在试验阶段接受了33次评估,但CAM的敏感性仅为0.5(0.22-0.78),特异性为1.0(0.81-1.0)。设计了一个“增强型”培训计划,该计划历时2个1小时,涉及基于案例的学习,重点关注NCHD遇到困难的领域。在研究的主要阶段,对52位患者进行了54次评估,并且CAM的性能显着改善。灵敏度为0.88(0.62-0.98),特异性为1.0(0.88-1.0)。结果表明,CAM是姑息治疗环境中有效的ir妄筛查工具,但其性能取决于操作员的技能。 NCHD在熟练使用前需要一定的培训标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号