...
首页> 外文期刊>Parking Review >Court of Appeal finds in favour of Parking Eye, but Beavis fights on: Driver raises funds to continue private land parking case
【24h】

Court of Appeal finds in favour of Parking Eye, but Beavis fights on: Driver raises funds to continue private land parking case

机译:上诉法院赞成“泊车眼”,但Beavis坚持不懈:驾驶员筹集资金以继续进行私人土地泊车案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Court of Appeal has dismissed a case brought against private parking operator ParkingEye by a motorist who argued that levying an £85 charge for an hour's overstay in a free car park was disproportionate and unlawful. Barry Beavis, the motorist, was issued with the parking charge notice (PCN) after he overstayed a two-hour limit at a retail park in Chelmsford in April 2013.
机译:上诉法院驳回了一名驾车者针对私人停车场运营商ParkingEye提起的诉讼,该驾车者辩称,在免费停车场逾时1小时要收取85英镑的费用是不相称的,也是违法的。驾车者巴里·比维斯(Barry Beavis)在2013年4月在切姆斯福德(Chelmsford)的一家零售公园逾两个小时的停车时间限制后,收到了停车收费通知(PCN)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号